User talk:Kurzov/Archive

Yoshi says
Welcome to my talk page. Talk to me here :P

Talk talk
BEGIN TALK PAGE

Proposed deletion of Justingen
Hello, Ncfriend. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Justingen, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

- Happysailor  (Talk) 01:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

DRV
Hi Ncfriend, I've removed the DRV because you wanted the article deleted .... and I closed the AFD 2 years ago as keep so my closure wasn't controversial nor incorrect, If you want to renominate the article for deletion please see WP:AFD - DRV is for when editor disagrees with the closure ..... inshort it's too late to disagree with a 2 year old closure..., Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Ncfriend. I've removed both your notices about attempted deletion review from the article and it's talk page for the reasons above and because there's been no discussion about the matter. I've commented on the talk page, creating a section for such a discussion if you want to start there. --Ronz (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

WP:ANRFC: assessing consensus at RfCs
Hi Ncfriend. I have removed the two done tags you placed at Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure. Your first comment here at Talk:Vaccine ("Closing the merge, as it has been a month without additional comment, and it seems the majority is opposing - if I am doing this wrong please inform me immediately") indicates that you are basing your close on a vote count ("it seems the majority is opposing") instead of assessing the Consensus, the strength of arguments based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You then wrote, "Er, it was already merged, closing as it has been merged" and struck out your earlier post. If the consensus is against a merge based on strength of arguments (or if there is no consensus for a merge done in the middle of the discussion), then the close should be "no consensus to merge" or "consensus is against a merge" and the merge should be undone. Your close here at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources also did not demonstrate an analysis of the arguments ("Closed to opposition consensus"). I recommend reviewing past RfC closes at Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 24 to observe they have been done. For examples of strong closes, I recommend reviewing closes by experienced active WP:ANRFC closers like (1, 2, and  3),  (1, 2, and 3),  (1 and 2),  (1),  (1),  (1), and  (User:S Marshall/RfC close log). These editors all do an excellent job of explaining how they assessed the consensus in the discussions. They discuss the different arguments advanced by editors in the discussion and assess the arguments' strengths based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines. They explain the scope of their closes and provide suggestions about further discussions that can be had. I hope this helps. WP:ANRFC always needs more closers, so I hope you observe how consensus is being closed and then start participating in assessing consensus in discussions. When closing discussions, feel free to ask me questions if you have any, or feel free to post at Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure to ask the community of closers for their opinions. Cunard (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the inconvience, and thank you! Ncfriend (talk) 09:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:W.T. Harris Boulevard (Charlotte)


A tag has been placed on Talk:W.T. Harris Boulevard (Charlotte) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Article is redundant to North Carolina Highway 24, has no real content nor provide any unique information not already covered in the other article"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WashuOtaku (talk) 04:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Bill Hell's Cars
Hello Ncfriend,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Big Bill Hell's Cars for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter
Noah Talk 22:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)