User talk:Kuser99

WinDirStat
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of WinDirStat, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.windirstat.info. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of WinDirStat
A tag has been placed on WinDirStat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Woland (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Woland (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of WinDirStat
I have nominated WinDirStat, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/WinDirStat. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 9Nak (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * In response to your note in the AfD discussion, Wikipedia does believe that knowledge should be free for all, but that doesn't mean it's an anarchy here. It would become useless as an encyclopedia if we allowed articles on every person (else we'd have been completely flooded with teenagers' vanity articles by now), every company, every piece of software, etc.  We have to draw the line somewhere, and the notability guidelines represent the community's current consensus on where that line should be.  To meet those guidelines, we ask that articles be sourced from verifiable reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  An article should also maintain a neutral point of view and not be promotional in nature.


 * I hope you'll check out some of these policy links, and make whatever improvements you can. If you have any other questions, let me know, or ask them on the AfD discussion page.  We're not trying to smack you down here, we're just trying to make this the best encyclopedia it can be.  Thanks.  -- Finngall   talk  18:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)