User talk:Kusha21

Any cut paste text has been inserted within QUOTE MARKS.

The text taken from MPRA has also been referenced.


 * You cannot paste text from MPRA even it is referenced to MPRA. And pasting such a big chunk of text from one academic paper is undue. Economy of India is a general economy article. Any single theory about certain aspects of the economy cannot be given such weightage here. So there are two different problems here - a) copyright violation b) giving undue weightage to a single paper. Please summarize this to a two-three lines and add it to the "Post-liberalisation period (since 1991)" section. Per wikipedia rules, if someone opposes / contests your addition to the article, discuss it in the talk page before. I will post this message there too. We can continue this discussion there --Sodabottle (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for advice. I have followed your suggestion.

Kindly also note that this article is a major breakthrough. This is not just another article published in a third rate journal. THE PAPER APPEARS IN A MOST RESPECTED JOURNAL PUBLISHED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS (U.K.) TITLED : INDIA REVIEW. This article is one of the longest research paper ever published in the journal (60 pages !).

Kindly give it the respect it deserves and let it get a wider academic attention.

SOMEONE HAS REMOVED EVEN THE SMALL ADDITION THAT WAS MADE, AS PER THE SUGGESSTION OF SODA BOTTLE !!


 * I believe the removal was a mistake. I have asked the other editor to put it back. The text you added is basically ok - it needs more tightening, copy editing and formatting - you have addressed both the concerns i raised. I have asked him to put it back explaining that it is good. (we dont usually add it back if someone else reverts). If and when he adds it back, i will do the copyediting.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks for your kind message. I'll wait to see my addition appear in this section. Thanks also for copy-editing help.