User talk:Kushan89

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dry needling has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dry needling was changed by Kushan89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860238 on 2017-06-25T04:59:17+00:00.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Kushan89, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Physical therapy have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Your addition to Physical therapy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. '' Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing.'' — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve D.K.Anthony
Hi, I'm SamHolt6. Kushan89, thanks for creating D.K.Anthony!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Numerous tags

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D.K.Anthony


A tag has been placed on D.K.Anthony requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cahk (talk) 08:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Stop it
Stop repeating these attempts to reclassify professions, or risk getting blocked. I left a comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Physical_therapy#Why_Physiotherapy_is_put_here_in_allied_health? here]. -- BullRangifer (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi I'm not reclassifying Physiotherapy .It's the classification given by WHO .im a Pg specialised Physiotherapists and I know what I'm talking and I'm not very good in Wikipedia editing.So please upload correct information about Physiotherapy thank you Kushan89 (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm a PT too, and you're wrong. The source you use doesn't even mention Allied health. Our Allied health professions article clearly mentions Physical Therapy. -- BullRangifer (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Can I know your qualifications to call yourself a PT if you don't mind.We were classified before in Allied health but not anymore.find out. Kushan89 (talk) 06:38, February 3, 2018‎ (UTC)


 * My qualifications as a PT are irrelevant here, but I have a four year BS degree, authorized in the European Union, and 20 years experience, mostly in private practice (my wife the same, but mostly hospitals). The PT article is a general article and we'd need reliable sources which show a change of status in a general, international, sense. If there is a change in India, that would need special mention, but has no effect on the classification for the profession on an international basis. The Allied health professions article would also need to be changed if there were an international reclassification.
 * So it comes down to finding RS. So far you haven't provided any which prove your point. -- BullRangifer (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of discretionary sanctions
Jytdog (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)