User talk:Kusma/Archive 40

DYK for Xie Fei (revolutionary)
—valereee (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Amalthea • Ihcoyc (deceased) • Kateshortforbob • Kirill Lokshin • Rifleman 82 • Ryan Norton • Wrp103

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Mr. Stradivarius



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Guideline and policy news


 * Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.


 * Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.

Arbitration


 * Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee:, , , , , , ,.

Miscellaneous


 * The functionaries email list () will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cajus Julius Caesar
Hello! Your submission of Cajus Julius Caesar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine  ✍  18:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Adhiraj Constructions
Hi Kusma,

It's great to connect with you. I am contributing to wikipedia for quite some time and would like to make a page on Adhiraj Constructions, not for promotional but informative purpose.

In my previous attempts to create this page, it was deleted considering promotional. Kindly notify me if you find anything promotional before activating deletion. I would love to learn from your expertise.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwrite1117 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It is not clear to me why you ask me, I don't do much with articles about companies, and most deleters seemed to be other people. From what I can see, you haven't shown any sources that would demonstrate that the company meets WP:NCORP, so there should be no article. —Kusma (talk) 20:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Rolf Segger
I totally missed the existence of the other article when I tagged it for CSD. Thanks for changing it to a redirect! Singularity42 (talk) 17:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * No worries, I only found it when looking through the creator's contributions. Target also needs cleanup... —Kusma (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1773 Phipps expedition towards the North Pole
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1773 Phipps expedition towards the North Pole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1773 Phipps expedition towards the North Pole
The article 1773 Phipps expedition towards the North Pole you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1773 Phipps expedition towards the North Pole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1886 St. Croix River log jam
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1886 St. Croix River log jam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dracophyllum -- Dracophyllum (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas
The article A Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dracophyllum -- Dracophyllum (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1886 St. Croix River log jam
The article 1886 St. Croix River log jam you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1886 St. Croix River log jam for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

HMS Swallow (1745)
Hi, just a heads up that I've now created HMS Swallow (1745). It's not perfect but I think it's a good enough start. I've attempted to add some detail to the section on her service as an exploration ship, but it's really not my forte and so it's still pretty sparse. Regards, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Wow, I'm impressed. I'll see whether I can add more on the circumnavigation when my book arrives, but I think this is ready for DYK at least. And much better than anything I could have done (when I write about ships, it tends to look like this: 1773_Phipps_expedition_towards_the_North_Pole). I'm also trying to figure out more about the story of the Patagonian giants that is behind the "recording the height of the natives" business. —Kusma (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The full quote I have from Clowes vol. 4 p. 120 is "In December, the  two  ships  anchored  in  the  same  place,  inside  Cape Virgins,  where  the  former  expedition  had  been,  and  where  Captain Byron  had  roughly  over-estimated  the  stature  of  the  Patagonians. Captain  Wallis  made  exact  measurements,  with  the  result  that the  tallest  among  them  were  found  to  be  from  six  feet  five  inches to  six  feet  seven  inches  in  height ;  the  average  being  from  five feet  ten  to  six  feet." Certainly not what one might expect the Royal Navy to be investigating! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I just got my hands on the 1964 edition of Byron's journal, and it has a lengthy appendix on the whole Patagonians story. There is a suggestion that the British government used the giants story to distract from Byron's visit to the Falklands (that turned into the Falklands Crisis of 1770) and the giants were certainly popular with the crowds at home (including the scientists at the Royal Society). So much fascinating history ... —Kusma (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1886 St. Croix River log jam
The article 1886 St. Croix River log jam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1886 St. Croix River log jam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Buchan (artist)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alexander Buchan (artist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Buchan (artist)
The article Alexander Buchan (artist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alexander Buchan (artist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 03:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 48, November – December 2021 
 * 1Lib1Ref 2022
 * Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AustralianRupert • Cimon Avaro • Euryalus • Jehochman • Nunh-huh
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes



Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Evad37 • Galobtter
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news
 * The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.

Technical news
 * The user group  will be renamed   in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
 * The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration
 * Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
 * The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
 * A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
 * Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander Buchan (artist)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for input on a featured article candidacy
Greetings, I have nominated Lake Estancia for a featured article nomination. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. The instructions for the review process are here. Thanks in advance for any comments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for An Account of the Voyages
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Modussiccandi
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BOZ • Brookie (deceased) • Jackmcbarn • Jamesday • Jonathunder • Master of Puppets • Saravask



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Guideline and policy news
 * A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
 * A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.

Technical news
 * The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project.
 * Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022.
 * The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.

Arbitration
 * Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
 * Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
 * The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Coming direct
Kusma - will you please explain to me what this list represents?  Atsme 💬 📧 23:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Atsme, it looks like a list of all books published by the "Verlag Ulmer Manuskripte" publishing company, sorted alphabetically by title. The website is essentially an ISBN database. —Kusma (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

March songs
Thank you for support in the RfC for DYK! Listening (at home, - sold out) to the charity concert mentioned here. I created the articles of the composer and the soprano. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Nice! I've been busy in the 15th-16th and 16th-17th centuries recently, bit different from my usual articles. —Kusma (talk) 00:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's good! The Prayer for Ukraine is on the Main page, finally + new flowers, and btw: the TFA is a young writer's first --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Rüdiger Huzmann
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks
Maybe I’ll wait for that crazy war to be over :) before touching anything Russia related. Thanks anyway for participating - GizzyCatBella  🍁  21:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kusma&action=edit
 * @GizzyCatBella: Probably that is a good idea. I never questioned your good faith in the discussion, but it is easy to be misunderstood. If your move proposal will happen after the war is over, let's hope you will make your proposal soon. —Kusma (talk) 21:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Ludwig Ferdinand Huber
Hi How are you? I had a look at the Ludwig Ferdinand Huber that you submitted for review. Would you mind if I reviewed it. I've done three reviews so far, all quite large articles. If it is ok, I will make a start tonight. Huber seems to be quite an interesting subject.  scope_creep Talk  12:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Scope creep, I'd be happy for you to review the article. Please let me know if you need access to the offline or paywalled sources. Looking forward to your review! —Kusma (talk) 12:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I will do. I guess nearer the time, although not see any as yet.   scope_creep Talk  12:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Scope creep: great. On a tangentially relevant note: thank you for your Red Orchestra-related work. I almost cited the work of Heinrich Scheel (historian), but in his three massive volumes (which are available on WP:TWL ) on the Republic of Mainz, he only mentions Huber's letters to Forster and vice versa and does not say anything much about Huber as a person. It is probably worth writing about Scheel's studies of republican Mainz in his article. Maybe I'll get around to it when I finally get back to working on the Republic of Mainz again. —Kusma (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please do. It would be great to see it expanded. As an historian he is likely to have several specific viewpoints that haven't even begun to be explored in the article and at the time I couldn't even do it justice. I added a single sentence in the lede that barely makes sense, even now I don't understand it. For me, it was his research into the Red Orchestra, and the work done that lead to their re-evaluation. He really did change the world in that aspect. I will read those three volumes, now I have access. I didn't even know they were volumes, even though I cited it.   scope_creep Talk  14:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ludwig Ferdinand Huber
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ludwig Ferdinand Huber you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Scope creep -- Scope creep (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry about that
I didn't realize that adding bold type to a vote on deletion was considered off-limits if it's another person's comment. Won't happen again. I was merely trying to keep with the format of bolding "keep" or "delete" votes that I've seen in other discussions. My bad and thanks for the correction. Fred Zepelin (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Fred Zepelin: No worries. I realise that my habit of sometimes deliberately not bolding comments may be a bit idiosyncratic, but I was trying to make a point of discussing instead of voting. —Kusma (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand that completely. I even assumed that you hadn't come to a decision on a vote to "delete" until your last comment, and your initial comment was taken by me as pure discussion, which I think is a good approach regardless. Fred Zepelin (talk) 15:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Arnold II of Isenburg
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Samuel Marolois
Hello! Your submission of Samuel Marolois at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pbritti (talk) 05:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 49, January – February 2022 
 * New library collections
 * Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

GA nomination of Ludwig Ferdinand Huber completed
Hi Kusma, the article Ludwig Ferdinand Huber you nominated as a good article has passed.  scope_creep Talk  11:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Scope creep, thank you for the detailed review and for your suggestions that have improved the article quite a bit. —Kusma (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ludwig Ferdinand Huber
The article Ludwig Ferdinand Huber you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ludwig Ferdinand Huber for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Scope creep -- Scope creep (talk) 12:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ludwig Ferdinand Huber
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Cajus Julius Caesar
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 00:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh lord, that is a particularly funny one...Nominative determinism in action! Keep up the good work! CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Glad you enjoyed it! —Kusma (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy April 1




Check it!

Your GA nomination of Rüdiger Huzmann
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rüdiger Huzmann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ulf Merbold
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ulf Merbold you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Samuel Marolois
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Adolf I von Nassau
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Firefly • Sdrqaz
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Geschichte • Ryan Postlethwaite • Sabine's Sunbird • Wassupwestcoast



Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.

Technical news
 * Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the  and   rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators.
 * When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present.

Arbitration
 * has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
 * A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
 * A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Peter Schöffer the Younger
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ulf Merbold
The article Ulf Merbold you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ulf Merbold for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Walther von Klingen
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rüdiger Huzmann
The article Rüdiger Huzmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rüdiger Huzmann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 06:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ulf Merbold
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

thank you for a steady flow of interesting DYK! - Ukraine day today: Maks Levin DYK, expanding Kyiv Symphony Orchestra (have tickets), and creating Anthony Robin Schneider, the bass who could be heard opening the singing in Beethoven's Ninth twice on 10 March 2022, live in Frankfurt, Germany, and recorded in Auckland, New Zealand, singing "Freiheit!" (freedom) instead of "Freude" (joy), in a tradition started after the Fall of the Wall. In case of interest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Sounds busy and fun! I haven't got any Ukraine in the pipeline, but should have some 18th/19th century women artists and writers ready for DYK in the next couple of weeks. If I don't get distracted by something else, as usual :) —Kusma (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * fun is a bit unexpected for a photographer who was a shot while working. Today mor fun: Dove sono (Where are those happy moments ...?) - concert with Kyiv orchestra and Aleksey Semenenko (quite a story!) tonight, Symphony with war and peace in the subtitle - Different topic: There's Draft:Helmut Günther, which should be in Main space. The user who didn't accept the move request has not responded to several questions. The author in German has responded, that the sources they gave are sufficient. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol on its last legs from Jimbo's talk page
It occurs to me that if the community stops bullying and banning the editors doing the work, that some of these backlogs wouldn't be as bad. But when they top editors all end up with targets on their backs, you end up with backlogs. I can think of a couple editors that would be helping with that if they were still allowed to edit.173.71.200.195 (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't know who you are referring to or why they no longer edit. I haven't done NPP for a very long time now and am not currently interested (this might change if new accounts are allowed to create articles again). —Kusma (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)