User talk:Kuszi

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Gdańsk University of Technology
Sure. I did it per WP:NOT. Generally long lists of stuff inside of article are poorly tolerated, especially when there are no articles for the items. For example, if two or three rectors had been notable people in polish history, we would be able to link their articles and add a short section for notable people associated with the university. But not a list of all the rectors. Why not all professors of physics or all majors offered? I worked though a lot of the uni articles when I was stub-sorting them, and I removed all such lists to standardize the set. Gdansk was not the only one. Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 23:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mike Pinkerton
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mike Pinkerton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mike Pinkerton. Thank you. -- mms 00:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Crypto
I see your point, but on the other hand, there isn't really anything to say about cryptology that is different from what we would want to say about cryptography. What you need to know to get acquainted with cryptology is the same as what you need to know to get acquainted with cryptography. If our main goal was to provide correct and clear definitions, we could maybe do better. But Wikipedia is not a dictionary - the main goal should be to present the overview as simply and clearly as possible. That said, although this is a featured article, I don't think the lead is that great, it is merely sufficient. So if you have any specific suggestions I'd love to see them. Mango juice talk 19:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Online compilers external links
The problem with linking to IDEone is (1) there are multiple sites like it and choosing between them is fairly arbitrary, so linking to just IDEone is effectively advertising and linking to all such sites would be impractical (2) it's not specific to any one language, so it's not especially relevant to any of them; linking to it from every supported language article is effectively spam or advertising. --Cyber cobra (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Fields Medal page
Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Rezameyqani (talk) 08:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)