User talk:KuwarOnline/Archive 3

{|style="userpage" align="center" style="text-align: center; border: 2px solid #88a; width:100%; background-color:lightBlue; box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 1.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 1.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 1.5em rgba(1,1,1,1.75); border-radius: 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1.5em; -webkit-border-radius: 1.5em;"
 * style="padding: 1em 1em;"|
 * style="padding: 1em 1em; text-align:left;"|

'Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave comments, critiques, etc., below. Unless you specifically request that I answer on your talk page, I'll be answering here, as I prefer to keep as much of the conversation in one place as possible. Thanks!'

Speedy deletion of Template:Indian expressways
A tag has been placed on Template:Indian expressways requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks.  Imzadi  1979   →   19:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have reverted your all edits regarding expressways in India. I think it would be better if we discuss before deleting, changing template, I dont think its duplication to any template. It has its good look and feel, more aesthetically pleasing than the rather bland Template:infobox road, If you still feels this template is duplicate please start discussion at Templates for discussion.  KuwarOnline ''' Talk 05:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * A discussion was opened at WT:INR, and when no comments were forthcoming, a test of the expressway articles was made, a test that you've rollbacked. The Indian templates violate MOS:FLAG by using the Indian flag at the top. Once the template was not in use, it was eligible for deletion under the CSD criteria T3 (not in use, and duplicates the function of another template). As for the look and feel, I disagree. Infobox road has been redesigned to work globally (almost 50 countries are supported), to comply with Accessbility guidelines, and to set up the color of the headers in the template to be customizable for any country. Autostrada A26 (Italy) will demonstrate that, as the Italian articles all use the same color green from the signage and the previous Italian infobox. The United States and Canada are switching to the shade of green that matches our guide signs, with brown as an option for historic and scenic highways. Canada is also going to use blue for their freeways. There are color schemes set up in the template to support the blue and yellow for Germany, or the blue/white, green/yellow and black/white of the United Kingdom.  Imzadi  1979   →   07:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't understand, first if want to make test edits then u could have done for say 1 or 2 article not 18 articles, If you were doing test edits then why you nominated template for deletion? or you doing other way like removing all link and then nominate of deletion on name of test edits?, Anyways I would really suggest that no good I idea to use normal template for expressway article, if expressway template violates any rule, then I need to fixed and make it as per polices, not delete/removed from wikipedia. As I said earlier If you still feels this template is duplicate/not necessary/useless etc etc. please start discussion/nominate for deletion at Templates for discussion/Log/2010 July 2. Whatever the result would be we will comply to that.  KuwarOnline ''' Talk 09:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Rschen7754 05:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Basically the issue is that rollback is for reverting vandalism only. 18 edits is a *lot* and that is why I brought it up to ANI, as it indicates a misunderstanding of the rollback policy. However, as long as you only use rollback for reverting vandalism it shouldn't be a problem again. (Rollback feature) --Rschen7754 05:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The user User talk:Imzadi1979 changed template to all pages of expressway, which I reverted and the discussion is underway, till time I reverted his all edits regarding changed in template. Once the discussion ends, whatever will be the result, will change according. I used rollback function because it was more, if it would have 1 or 2, I would have used normal undo. Certainly not misused.  KuwarOnline ''' Talk 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * How is that vandalism? --Rschen7754 05:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please remove my rollback right, Certainly in future I will only use rollback to revert mass edits, so it better, I should not have it. thanks  KuwarOnline ''' Talk 05:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Misleading Topicon
Since you have asked for the rollback bit to be removed, and that it has been done, you should remove the topicon from your user and talk pages. Codf1977 (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ohh, thanks, I almost forgot, thanks for reminding.  KuwarOnline ''' Talk 07:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nelito Systems


The article Nelito Systems has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability. References given are press releases, internal or references to the parent company. Google search does not pick up anything to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If google doesnt pick anything to establish notability then how to find reference?  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 12:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Nelito Systems
I have nominated Nelito Systems, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nelito Systems. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hotels in Delhi
I would suggest getting User:KuwarOnline/List of hotels in Delhi back up and working in some form. The alexa site stats says it has pretty high importance on google india, it would be a good way to improve Wikipedia traffic. Sadads (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I didnt understand the first line you said, can explain more? thanks  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 16:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you have a pretty good draft, and I see that the you salvaged it when it was deleted the first time. If you could rebuild it, addressing the issues of the deletion discussion, then it would be good for Wikipedia. Examples of similar pages include Hotels in Istanbul, List of hotels in Dubai, and List of Las Vegas Strip hotels. Sadads (talk) 16:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will start working on it. If you suggest anything to improve, please do so. It was deleted under CSD  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 17:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Courtyard by Marriott Mumbai
Thank you for your message. I've restored the article to User:KuwarOnline/Courtyard by Marriott Mumbai. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...
...that answers something I was wondering and removes an item from my to-do list. TFOWR 13:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * welcome, today I might complete articles around 200 at least... from A to C from Category:Articles needing link rot cleanup

Orphaned non-free image File:Nellogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nellogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Scrollbars
I saw your note on User talk:Nigel Ish. WP:SCROLL is the relevant guideline. - BilCat (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for Info :)  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 12:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Scrolling references
Scrolling references are prohibited here - Citing_sources - they stop printing and cause accessibility problems, and can make it harder for readers to see the fulkl list.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for info :)  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 11:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Durgapur Xpressway.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Durgapur Xpressway.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I already sent permission mail to permission-en AT wikipedia DOT org.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 08:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Indira Gandhi International Airport
Hi...Although I appreciate your warning, I by no means, am indulging in 'disruptive' editing of the IGI page. The article suggests the Delhi is the second busiest airport in India after Mumbai in terms of passengers... Not only is it wrong but the fact that you dont read news papers makes it weirder that you are accusing me of making disruptive changes. Delhi is busiest in terms of passengers and aircraft movement Delhi has last year handled 26.2M passengers per annum compared to BOMs 25.8. So please check your sources back...I guess ill make an account again(My last account being hacked)and then make changes and back it up with a reference but I guess you as a prime contributor to WIKI India sections should take into consideration the changes before shooting emails.I am not vandalizing the thread I assure you. Period

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.9.38 (talk) 22:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there, As you removed the complete sentence without reading the sources added to prove that claim, if you have any better/quality sources that says that delhi is most busiest in term of passenger traffic add it to article and remove the claim I made, As you said "So please check your sources back", I will advice you to check the source I have added to it. It says "For the financial year 2008-09, while the Mumbai airport recorded 23.6 million passenger footfalls, the Delhi airport recorded 22.84 million". There are lots admin/sr editors watching this(IGI) article, Still no body removed the sentence you removed. simply because, Whatever I have added is backed by quality reference. So removing claims backed with quality source is called Vandalism. Reason is, its deliberate act.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 04:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with "The Dolmen" article
Thank you so very much for your help in brushing up and improving the reference pages/links in my first article on the Weymouth band, The Dolmen. There is quite a bit to learn regarding proper posting of articles within Wikipedia, and I am so grateful for pointers and assitance as I make my through the labyrinth. Regards, Ceitidh (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome my friend, If you want to learn about writing proper article here is great way to start see Article wizard.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 05:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Template:Indian expressways has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  Imzadi  1979   →   08:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hi KuwarOnline, Is is ok to add Shopping mall lists to metropolis articles. -- Onef9day  Talk! 10:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Onef9day, Yes you can added, no harm if u add in see also section e.g. Delhi or any specific section like shopping e.g Gurgaon.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 11:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * hi, thanks for reply. I checked delhi article and got the idea how the list has been made. thanks for quick reply. cheers! -- Onef9day  Talk! 05:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Durgapur Xpressway
- F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 17:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Need Help With Citation
Hi, I want to know how to fix citation in cite book. i find it difficult to do it. Please check this for citations 23 and 24. tell how to used single citation more than once. -- Onef9day  Talk! 13:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * hmm there is very simple way to do it. just visit following link citfixes and add your article name there. click run reflink wait for while till toolserver do the job for you after some time go to end of the page and follow.  KuwarOnline  Talk''' 14:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! i'll try this tool. Thanks again. cheers! -- Onef9day  Talk! 14:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)