User talk:Kuzemsky

Image tagging for Image:Image-Kuz5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Kuz5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 16:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Alexander Kuzemsky
Thanks for the article, I have cleaned it up a little bit. I guess the article is about you or your close relative. Usually it is very difficult to be neutral when writing about yourself that is why we have a policy named WP:AUTO, it would be much better to write about physics or other physicists than about yourself.

The second problem is notability. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a Who is Who listing every academics in existence. It has much stricter criteria of notability WP:PROF in a nutshell the subject of the article should be more notable than an average Professor working in a major western University. Because of the "systematical bias" there are even less articles on Russian scientists, so the requirements are even higher. Please read WP:PROF and see if you are ready to provide required references. If not, I could move the article into your userspace.

Please understand me correctly, there is no question you are much more notable then all wikipedia "experts" in physics and Russian science. The question is if the subject is worth to stand in the same raw as Einstein, Newton or Landau. We have articles on less than 5% of members of the Russian Academy of Science, thus, in a way the requirements are higher in Wiki than in RAS. Alex Bakharev 16:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that notability is established by references to publications of independent parties who evaluate the notability of the person. Wikipedia editors cannot declare someone's importance themselves, only by refence to published opinions of pers of the person in question. I understand that for scientists it is much more difficult than for porn stars. A good indication may be person's citation index (rather than the list of publications). `'mikka 01:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kuz7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kuz7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)