User talk:Kvalnes11

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

A K Dolven
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A K Dolven, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://tanneryarts.org.uk/artists/dolven.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The article has been deleted, so you may not get to read my reply on the Talk page, so here's your statement and my reply...
 * It is correct that the text largely equals the text on the Tannery Arts website. However, that text is in no way copyrighted and can be referred to and copied freely. I know since I am the source of that text too.
 * Any text that is published is automatically copyrighted unless it is stated to be released (into the public domain, or by suitable license) - and that page does actually carry a copyright statement at the bottom. If you wish to release that text for use on Wikipedia, have a look at Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to do it (Anyone could claim anything on a Talk page, so we do need some sort of proper procedure). Regards -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I've deleted the article. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at the article talk page saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  11:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

more
I've tweaked refs 2 and 3, and the first EL to show how to make them more informative. It's basically [url description], instead of just the bare url. I was going to sort the further reading (best done as a list with each item preceded by *, which converts to a bullet point), but I'm confused by the different orders of authors, titles and date and odd capitalisation. Note that books should be italicised.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)