User talk:Kvaruca/sandbox

Hey, I'm here to do some peer review! I think you've done a good job of staying on the topic of the article and staying unbiased. It might be good to break up the text into smaller chunks or to include a picture. A picture of the domain might also help readers to understand exactly how the beta sheets connect. Your sources are good, but it looks like you have the class textbook cited twice. Another source might round things out. You've done a good job citing facts as they come up, but I think it would be cool if you also link to other wikipedia pages, maybe the page for beta sheets or the influenza virus. I can see that you're still working on things, so good luck! Shudadoff3 (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello guys! I agree with Sarah about breaking up the text some, headers are you friends! I don't think you could go wrong with keeping the image that is currently on the Beta propeller stub. I might be wrong, but you might want to make sure that you don't need at least 5 sources. You've got a lot of facts but very little relevance. Focus more on some examples of where beta-propellers are in nature and what they're useful for. For example, one question you might address is: Does the funnel-like shape of the beta-propeller actually serve to kind of funnel ligands toward the active site. Just stuff to think about! Hscelsi3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)