User talk:Kwilde

cuz it's not right to block users from editing Wikipedia
 * Umm, you aren't blocked . Teke ( talk ) 03:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The Big Gym
This article has been deleted as it failed to establish the notability of its subject.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   23:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Lucky 6.9 01:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends: The Movie

 * You have recently re-created the article Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends: The Movie. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Deletion review. Danny Lilithborne 01:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Mark McGwire Day
This appears to be a made-up holiday as no verifiable sources were cited. I've added the "prod" template to the article Mark McGwire Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Mark McGwire Day. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Before deciding to remove the template, however, please see WP:N and WP:NFT, as the subject of the article does not appear to satisfy this criteria. Accurizer 23:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)