User talk:Ky4649/sandbox

1. Does each sentence of the proposed edit lead back to a reliable source for a reference or citation? If not, point out which ones do not, and how they need to be fixed.

Every sentence that Sohil uses leads back to a reliable source, he continuously proves this by speaking and showing about how him or one of his group members added sufficient proof for his remarks.

2. Is any of the language that the edit uses subjective or not-neutral? For example, "most popular pop singer" is a subjective criteria that is not neutral. However, "winner of 10 Grammy awards", when backed up by a reliable source, is acceptable as it makes use of verifiable information.

After much time assessing his paper, he does not use and language or improper criteria that is not-neutral or subjective.

3. Does the language contain contains unsourced opinions and value statements, which are not neutral and should be removed? For example, instead of saying: “She was the best singer,” the text should say: “She had 14 number one hits, more than any other singer.”

No, the text does not contain any unsourced opinions or statements that claim any bias.