User talk:Kyiv3684B

May 2019
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Padmasambhava, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 16:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Flag icons
Hi. Please note that flag icons are, in general, discouraged (see WP:FLAGICON. Even if that were not the case, flags such as the Alam of the Mughal Empire are unverified and the consensus here is that it is a bogus flag. Flags, like everything else on Wikipedia, need to be reliably sourced. I just noticed you're new here so I've dropped a templated message below with links you may find useful. --regentspark (comment) 20:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Kyiv3684B, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. regentspark (comment) 20:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Chanda Sahib ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chanda_Sahib check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chanda_Sahib?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Dupleix
 * Russian Empire ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Russian_Empire check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Russian_Empire?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Battle of Narva

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Chauth. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chanda Sahib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dupleix ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chanda_Sahib check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chanda_Sahib?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Careful editting
Some of your edits are concerning.

You delete a picture of a real scimitar and replace it with a drawing. Why? What good is that?

You add a comment that is not really useful. I could add a comment that a lot of newspaper pages were printed because of the war, and that would be just as useful (and just as uncited).

You delete "Physical harrasment, Psychological harassment" and replace with "Wartime sexual violence", leaving in "Sexual assault" and "Rape", which are both sexual violence. You removed stuff and duplicated other stuff. And no edit summary explaining. Huh? Why?

You add serious allegations without any cites or edit summary. That just isn't correct to do.

Did you not notice section Karachi? You added duplicate statements, again without citations or edit summaries. What good does this do?

This is very surprising to add without citations. Who says this? Besides you, that is.

Was there a reason to change the representation of the siege, or was it just your opinion, or some other internal reason? No edit summary means we are left to guess.

In section Turkey, which is supposed to be about that period in history, you replaced the picture of a mosque built in that period (1274) with a different picture of a different mosque completed this year, in the period covered by the next section Turkey. This is not explainable at all.

You removed text that had nothing to do with the text you wanted to add. Why? And where are the citations that back up your added text?

This is called Original Research and is not allowed.

And again, which you defend even when reverted, saying something about "no taboo" (which shows you can use edit summaries), when the real problem is that the use of the elephant symbol is discussed elsewhere under History, which you read (your earlier edits), but you feel your WP:OR deserves to be in the lede. Why?

Sorry to say, but of the latest 40+ edits, I can only agree with a single one, where you actually linked to a better explanation of the term.

Please consider your priorities may be at cross-purposes with Wikipedia practice. Much of this looks more like ego than good editing. Shenme (talk) 20:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. regentspark (comment) 21:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You really need to stop adding unsourced text to historical articles. Wikipedia is a sourced encyclopedia, not a crowd sourced one, so please only add material that is attributed to a reliable source. You will end up blocked if you stick to your penchant for unsourced rambling on content pages. --regentspark (comment) 21:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)