User talk:Kylara21

Hi Kylara21. I've removed the speedy template from the article you've been writing. Before you spend too much time on this, you might want to check out the article "What wikipedia is not". I'm not saying that what you've written is (or is not) wikipedia-worthy, but someone else might nominate the article for deletion by a slower process. Best wishes, and welcome to wikipedia. Bucketsofg✐ 23:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * - Okay. I believe this qualifies as the kind of information that exists for fiction; for instance, I found that the category "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" may perhaps apply, though I would argue to the death otherwise and that the closest candidate is likely the Naked in Death article, which admittedly is long-winded.  Thank you for your comments, however.  Kylara21 23:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Zebra-Petals?
Hey Kylara, didn't I know you on Prodigy Classic? Your name definitely rings a bell! --Magmagirl 15:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Edits
Kylara21, can you please answer this editor who has prolific questions? It is on the Talk page of the In Death Characters. I doubt you lifted word for word from any of the books, but a word from you might put an end to his last question. Thanks. Sh33na 08:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh33na (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Roarke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Roarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)