User talk:Kylarsmith08/sandbox

Evaluating an Article
Attractiveness is not an easy subject to write about because it is very broad and very subjective and culture-specific. But it seems that you're finding some sources, which is the key to success. Which academic fields attempt to define and study attractiveness? Psychology, sociology, art theory, economics?

Your suggestion to delete unsupported, distracting, or speculative sections of an article may also not be a bad idea.

To move forward, decide which article you want to focus on and keep collecting possible sources. Post them in your sandbox. Josef Horáček (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You have some good sources. Find some relevant information from those sources to add to the article. Josef Horáček (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

I see you started drafting some contributions. You should revise the sentence about the face. "Visual stimuli" doesn't need to be in quotation marks, you should avoid using and/or (use one or the other), and you should avoid using the vague "you." Replace "you" with some like "a person."

The section about mental attractiveness (not attraction) is promising. Keep working! Josef Horáček (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment
"Attractiveness" was not an easy article to work on. Your contributions did improve it, although there were some problems with wording and citations. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)