User talk:Kyle1278-2/2013-2015 Archive

Talkback
TBrandley (what's up) 18:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Paget, Ontario for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articlePaget, Ontario is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paget, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.AddisWang (talk) 19:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Catholicfortmcmurry.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Catholicfortmcmurry.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: "Not negative as long as it is faculty accuate and abides by WP:Neutral there is no reason for removal."
I'm not a PR agent or something but I always understood it's not what's factually accurate but what secondary sources say. Isn't there a specific provison for language like "has been criticized" on bios? Alkidonian (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes in bios you have to be careful of what is written and remain neutral. As you have probably seen on the page "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page". I have look at the sources that have been provided and have noticed that some are dead links. That does not mean instant removal of said content. What should be done first is, a look for a new reference for the information. If you can't not find one then editing what is there down too what can be established through any sources that are still active. If those two fail to work then removal is justified. I am not going to undo your edit again, it's just best to try to find sources about the content, rather than just completely removing it. In this case there is not much secondary sources to back it up. The Philip DeFranco wiki page has always been fairly poorly written and needs an complete over hall in my opinion. Sadly I find this a case with a lot of internet personality wiki pages. They get bogged down with misinformation or information that may be true but is almost impossible to verify. If you need any other help feel free to leave a message!  Kyle  1278  01:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

City nicknames in infoboxes
As you and were participants in this discussion, I thought you might be interested in this current discussion at WP:CANTALK regarding city nicknames in infoboxes. The outcome may have implications on how Edmonton's nicknames are handled within its infobox. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:G manitoba.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:G manitoba.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Dry lightning
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Dry lightning &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Pierre cb (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)