User talk:Kyle1278-2/2018-2023 Archive

Category:Radio stations in West Edmonton Mall has been nominated for discussion
Category:Radio stations in West Edmonton Mall, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 20:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers
There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo riocan.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo riocan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greenwood, Huron County, Ontario


The article Greenwood, Huron County, Ontario has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unable to find a place by this name in Huron County - checked Google maps and official Ontario Road maps. Coordinates in the article point to a spot in Lambton County, near Sarnia. Coordinates used in an earlier version of the article indicate a place in Ohio."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  PK T (alk)  19:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Publicfortmcmurry.png
Thanks for uploading File:Publicfortmcmurry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

"Warnstorfia exannulata" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Warnstorfia exannulata. Since you had some involvement with the Warnstorfia exannulata redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Plantdrew (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Weybridge, Newfoundland and Labrador


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Weybridge, Newfoundland and Labrador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wylie39 (talk) 23:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing List of Massacres in Canada
Hello! Not sure how best to go about getting a message to you, but there's a bit of a kerfluffle going on on the list of Massacres in Canada page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_massacres_in_Canada) where some events are being removed because they don't have the word "Massacre" in the name, including the recent killings in Nova Scotia.

I'm bringing this to your attention because you are the one who added that criteria to the page, and I personally think it's too limiting, though I understand the motivation to have some criteria, I think that isn't a good requirement for inclusion... I'd appreciate you weighing in on this as the original person to add the criteria that is now being used to remove many events that I think fit the (admittedly loose) definition of a massacre.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.84.195.234 (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campus Saint-Jean.png
Thanks for uploading File:Campus Saint-Jean.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glentworth, Saskatchewan


The article Glentworth, Saskatchewan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Has no meaningful content, revision history can't dig up any cited content either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FozzieHey (talk) 19:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mansfield Point, Newfoundland and Labrador


The article Mansfield Point, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a point not a community http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Mansfield+Point&category=O"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 05:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bull Cove


The article Bull Cove has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cove, not a settlement"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 05:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burnt Island Tickle


The article Burnt Island Tickle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tickle/channel, not a settlement, unsourced."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Campbell's Creek


The article Campbell's Creek has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Campbell%27s+Creek+&category=O Creek, not a settlement. Unsourced."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cape North, Newfoundland and Labrador


The article Cape North, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cape, not a settlement http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique/AAPPD"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mill Road, Prince Edward Island


The article Mill Road, Prince Edward Island has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A road, not a notable place. Notability not established with substantive sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Village at Pigeon Lake


The article Village at Pigeon Lake has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Commercial development https://www.villageatpigeonlake.com/ fails WP:GEOLAND2"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crockers Cove


The article Crockers Cove has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Cove or neighborhood fails WP:GEOLAND http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Crockers+Cove+&category=O"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fish Cove


The article Fish Cove has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cove, not a settlement http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Fish+Cove+%E2%80%8E&category=O"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fleury's Bight


The article Fleury's Bight has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable bight, not a settlement https://www.google.com/maps/place/Fleury+Bight,+NL+A0H+1L0,+Canada/@49.5302721,-55.3109619,1865m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4b779a7e9f0835c5:0x3275920ffaa29848!8m2!3d49.532839!4d-55.299246?hl=en http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Fleury%27s+Bight&category=O"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Venison Tickle


The article Venison Tickle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tickle/channel, not a settlement http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Venison+Tickle&category=O"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wolf Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador


The article Wolf Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cove, not settlement http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Wolf+Cove&category=O ; unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cat Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador


The article Cat Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Based on the coordinates, this seems to be a minor body of water known as Cat Cove Pond, not a settlement."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1890 in Alberta


A tag has been placed on Category:1890 in Alberta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 13:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:School SPRINGlol.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:School SPRINGlol.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 02:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Falgoffogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Falgoffogo.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 02:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Poste Montagnais, Quebec for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poste Montagnais, Quebec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Poste Montagnais, Quebec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Poste Montagnais, Quebec for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poste Montagnais, Quebec, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Poste Montagnais, Quebec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mission Lake Subdivision, Saskatchewan


The article Mission Lake Subdivision, Saskatchewan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This place doesn't exist. The coordinates take you to a farmer's field along a gravel road. Try as I might, I can find no such place in Saskatchewan. The article is unsourced, so I can't even check to see where the original author got the information from. (this is my 1st time putting an article up for deletion so if I missed a step, help point me in the right direction. Thanks!)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Lucas, British Columbia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas, British Columbia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lucas, British Columbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lennart97 (talk) 13:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo topleftReddeer.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo topleftReddeer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AUPE logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:AUPE logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 23:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Kyle1278-2! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pynn's Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pynn's Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pynn's Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jackson Bay, British Columbia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson Bay, British Columbia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jackson Bay, British Columbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Slywriter (talk) 01:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stony Plain logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Stony Plain logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 04:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Edmonton nominated for GA reassessment
Edmonton has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Red vs. Blue media


A tag has been placed on Category:Red vs. Blue media indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abbot Pond


The article Abbot Pond has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abbots Pond


The article Abbots Pond has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No references and a search doesn't find anything useful. It seems to be only a pond, not a settlement.(https://geonames.nrcan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique?id=AASQE)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter James (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)