User talk:KyleAaronScarborough

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page A.C. St. Louis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 05:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of River City Saints


The article River City Saints has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable group of local soccer boosters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 03:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of River City Saints
I have nominated River City Saints, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/River City Saints. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 05:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with River City Saints. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 09:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to River City Saints, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: River City Saints was changed by KyleAaronScarborough (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-30T07:43:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of River City Saints
A tag has been placed on River City Saints requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. X X X antiuser eh? 08:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as River City Saints, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. X X X antiuser eh? 08:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RCSlogo.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RCSlogo.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

And two others-- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)