User talk:KyleJoan/Archives/2019/November

Dragula
Hey there, just wanted to drop a message here as I'd like to gather other editors opinions about a certain matter going on over at the The Boulet Brothers' Dragula page, more specifically with different perspectives with a color template and note. I have made a section on the articles talk page regarding this issue, allowing other editors to give their opinions on the matter. Seeing as we've had a little history of different perspectives that have come to a positive mutual conclusion on the Total Divas page, I would like to hear from you and I would value your opinion greatly. Thank you! MSMRHurricane (talk) 05:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Reminder
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! TheHotwiki (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

The Real Housewives of New York City
Since you always seem want to have the final say in the article of The Real Housewives of New York City. First, by declaring width size in wikitables for absolutely no reason. Second, using you personal assumption as a reason to your edits. Third, making the section look like a newspaper article when you've already been told that this is an encyclopedia. Please read Read Wikipedia is not a newspaper. And also Your recent editing history  shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TheHotwiki (talk) 08:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * It sounds like I've been exhibiting chronic, intractable behavior. Would you like to report me to ANI for edit warring? Here is the link if you are inclined. If not, I'll keep editing according to WP:CS and add appropriate citations. Cheers!
 * P.S. I read Wikipedia is not a newspaper, and it states: Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, written from a neutral point of view and based on reliable sources and objectivity. Thank you very much for referring me to the guideline that supports the notion that citing three reliable sources to confirm the cast for the series' twelth season is both neutral and objective. I'm glad we are in agreement!
 * Correction: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper is not even a guideline, so as of right now, a total of 0 guidelines have been cited in support of your reverts. Here are some guidelines that support mine:


 * The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. The material is supported by three inline citations.
 * Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content. The cast list is not a rumor; it is factual information.
 * In subsequent sections dealing with real-world information, their surname should be used. The returning cast members listed in the article are listed by their surnames.
 * Anything else? KyleJoan talk  12:14, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Inappropriate Behavior
Please stop casually addressing me on pages where it's clearly inappropriate. There is no need for a "welcome back" from you to me written on The Real Housewives of New York's Revision History Page, (*side note...I never left). If you need to send a message related to editing, please do so where that kind of thing belongs. Definitely not on a reality show's Revision History page, and just to note there wasn't even a revision made. You already know I have no interest in engaging with you on a personal level, so stop baiting me to get a reaction, this is the only time I'm going to address this with you.


 * I understand you have no interest in engaging me, so much so that you reverted the addition of three sources, which does not adhere to WP:BRD and WP:V, and not to mention specifically reached out to two editors with whom I have had disagreements. Your disinterest in my editing endeavors is very clear. Welcome back indeed! KyleJoan  04:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

It's not just your editing, it's your aggressive behavior towards pages that interest you and any editor that dares to change those pages. Your interaction with me and other editors is problematic. Please limit your interaction with me to editing, I'm not interested in your greetings and little personal messages to me here and there. AnAudLife (talk) 05:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't know how many more times I can state that WP:ANI is available for you to report my problematic behavior. If you feel that an ANI report is unwarranted, then let's continue to have productive discussions. Cheers to you! KyleJoan  05:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. AnAudLife (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)