User talk:Kyle Bertram

Your edit to General Thomas William Sweeny
Your recent edit to General Thomas William Sweeny (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 03:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Please see my reason behind this at Tawkerbot4's talk page. Ryūlóng 03:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How is this warning legitimate? Did you even look at what this "bot" did? Why do you have bots here? Are you a bot? I feel so confused.

I'm sick of this, I'm done with this. Not a fun moment anymore... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle Bertram (talk • contribs)
 * It is a legitimate warning because you had notified that it was copyright violation, and you just removed all content from the page. I know that you are new, but you still have to follow the rules, even if you don't know them all exactly. Ryūlóng 03:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

(copied over from User talk:Tawkerbot4)

I'm trying to help, why did you do this??? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=General_Thomas_William_Sweeny&diff=71938233&oldid=62422321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle Bertram (talk • contribs)
 * I believe I'll answer. Kyle, this user (Tawkerbot) is a bot (a script) that is used to edit Wikipedia to revert massive page blankings. What you had done was the wrong way to say that the page was a copyvio. Ryūlóng 03:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * What is this copyvio thing? Bots? Why do you have bots? I'm so confused...I think I'm done with this thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle Bertram (talk • contribs)
 * Copyvio is what Wikipedia uses to denote articles that are copied and pasted from other websites. And Wikipedia has bots to prevent vandalism, which is what I said above. Ryūlóng 03:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

How am I supposed to know what I've never been told. That's unfair. :(