User talk:Kyleandrewblake

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gordon Brown with the Spirit of London Awards.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Gordon Brown with the Spirit of London Awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:57, 1 December 2012 (UT

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David Cameron speaks to SOLA.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:David Cameron speaks to SOLA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Spirit of London Awards - Downing Street.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Spirit of London Awards - Downing Street.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright of images you are adding
You do not own the copyright of the images you are adding. If you look at the page that documents the images you can see its metadata. Your photo of Cameron, for instance, states;

Image title 	LONDON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 19: attends a reception hosted by David Cameron ahead of the Spirit Of London Awards at 10 Downing Street on September 19, 2011 in London, United Kingdom. (Photo by Dave J Hogan/Getty Images)

Copyright holder 2011 Getty Images

Author 	Stringer, Dave J Hogan

This means that these images are copyright Getty Images and you do not own the rights to release them for use on Wikipedia.

-- Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:45, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * So why is their copyright on it? It also matters little whether they own it or "Spirit of London Awards" own it.  You cannot release it under Commons licensing while still claiming copyright of it.  You can't say one thing on Flikr, and another on Wikipedia.


 * My apologies for deleting everything you had done, I didn't realise you had added more than just the photos, but I should have checked. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 00:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply. You should read Wikipedia policy on images as I'm afraid you are likely to have further problems uploading images as long as they retain copyright notices belonging to others.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 00:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

I am speaking to their copyright department at the moment, It does not matter if a different name is on it, it is about if you paid to own it and we have. Like is said papers do the same thing, they own all the images printed but the photographer gets credit for taking the photo --Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

After one month of owning the copyright we allow our picture to be in the public domain, otherwise our young people cannot use them. The copyright ownership on flicker is probably because it has not been updated, that will be sorted out. But we do not claim copyright over those images anymore, but the person who took the photo still needs to be credited which is why their name is on it, but they have no claim to copyright.--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand what you are saying. The problem is that the image's metadata indicate that the photo agency Getty Images, not the photographer, claim ownership of them.  This usually means that the photographer was working for Getty Images, or has sold them the rights.  Yes the photographer can be credited, but it is the photo agency that owns the copyright.  Getty Images never release the copyright on photos they own, it's what makes them their money. In fact they are known for aggressively defending their copyright. You'll need to demonstrate that you own the photos, and find out why their copyright is on them.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 11:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SOLO - Royal Albert Hall.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:SOLO - Royal Albert Hall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)