User talk:Kylee2006

Speedy deletion of "Federal bureaucracy"
A page you created, Federal bureaucracy, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  22:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Senate bill 0099
I have nominated Senate bill 0099, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Senate bill 0099. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Loonymonkey (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Focus on policies/guidelines
It really is best to focus on the policies and guidelines of the project when at AfD discussions. The most relevant policies/guidelines you may wish to look at are notability,  verifiability,  reliable sources, [and  coatrack You may also find the help section listed just to your left under interaction to be useful. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Kylee2006 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Loonymonkey (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See advice and closing here: Suspected_sock_puppets/Kylee2006 — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)