User talk:Kylefloyd10/Eelpout

My peer review: I think the Lead section is very concise and clear, however there are some grammar mistakes that could be fixed. Namely, capitalizing the names of the oceans this organism is found in. The tone of the article is very neutral and includes a lot of facts which is great! All the sources in the bibliography seemed to be reputable sources, and I appreciated that the information included in the article was clearly attributed to a source. Also, there are sources from a wide range of years which represents the breadth of the information available. I was a little confused by the timeline that is included in the page, so perhaps adding some more text which explains the image would be helpful.

Overall, I thought it looked really great and I really enjoyed learning about a new species! Whalenmr (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! We'll take a look at those edits. I added some more information and will try to have the timeline make more sense. I also started a new section, and will add more information to it (evolution) Michaelbev5 (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Edits
I added some references, and am trying to edit more wordings before we add this to the live article Michaelbev5 (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Kyle, if possible, maybe explain some of the scientific "jargon" to help people understand. Also add an intro sentence to the second section. Michaelbev5 (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * sorry i changed the order of sections, its now the third section Michaelbev5 (talk) 22:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)