User talk:Kyliestar

June 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Rodriguez, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.Richiekim (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Richiekim (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Richiekim (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Alex Rodriguez
He's dating Kate Hudson. It's been pretty well established. Therefore, it belongs in his article. Please do not remove it again. --Muboshgu (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Please have more valid information other than I read it from a Perez Hilton Blog or I seen it posted on another website, or gossip magazine. Either have a statement from a publicist or from Rodriguez himself. Do not ruin the integrity of this site that's sole purpose is to give the reader valid information.
 * It's cited from valid sources. We don't need to wait for a publicist.  He took her to a family picnic at Yankee Stadium.  That's valid, and it's more than enough to establish its notability.  --Muboshgu (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Muboshgu (talk) 11:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Visitors view this site as a reliable source of information for their own academic or personal research. Writers who choose to contribute to this site should be responsible for what they choose to write, save, and edit. They should also consider whether the information is relevant and has been confirmed by the parties involved or by a reliable source. Gossip sites and magazines depending solely on "Unnamed sources" is inappropriate for this site. Visitors searching for reliable information shouldn't have to compare this site to a gossip site. If visitors choose to read gossip there are plenty of sites they can go on and this site should not be one of them. To make sure this site's integrity isn't compromised only information sited by reliable sources and relevant information only.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Rodriguez, you will be blocked from editing. What part of "stop" and "it is reliably sourced and relevant information" do you not understand? --Muboshgu (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

When a story concerning an individual's personal life is not confirmed by the individual, the other party involved, or a reliable source be responsible as a writer not to mislead the readers and say it's only reported information that's not confirmed. Do not jeopardize the integrity of this website. You have by putting an unconfirmed date of this so-called relationship and you have no real reliable sources to confirm the nature of the parties involvement. It's very simple being seen from the member of an opposite sex in public doesn't establish anyone as "clearly together." Myself and other women in this country have platonic friends that we socialize with in public places and it does not confirm that we're dating them. I respect the fact that we have been going on almost the whole week debating and I hope you are satisfied with the minor change.

What part of having integrity and taking responsibility do you not understand? If there was anyway for me to make you and accountable for the highest extent for every sentence you write down I sure would but my hands are tied as of now. Please don't send me anymore messages your ignorance speaks enough volumes for me.

Are you trying to purposely irritate me? The man has 573 homeruns now. He had homered last night against the Red Sox. I was even at the game during the time. It's okay to put down information from unnamed sources on this page but it's a wrong idea to put down something you had witnessed an individual do in front of 40,000 people?
 * I thought my edit summary comment was clear. The stats listed on A-Rod's infobox are as of August 2.  If you want to update his stats, you need to update all of them at once.  You can't pick and choose which stats to update.  --Muboshgu (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

I updated his stats just as you suggested
 * You did something wrong. You put his average as .257 but his career average is .304.  His season average is .259 so I don't know where you got that number.  You also neglected to update his hits or RBI's.  Please be more careful in the future. --Muboshgu (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I regret making those errors.