User talk:Kypickle

July 2023
I notice you've edited a number of articles on exoplanets given proper names through NameExoWorlds to change almost every instance of their designation to their proper name. Please don't do this; in most cases the designation is the more common name which is why it's the article title. If you think the proper name should be the article title you can open a move request, though I'd note there's already general consensus against this. SevenSpheres (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The only reason the designation is more common is because the official names aren't used. That's what I'm trying to change. I'll stop, but I don't agree with it. Kypickle (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not sure where the Wikipedia: namespace page about this is, but if you want to change something editing Wikipedia isn't the way to do it. I have seen some exoplanet names being used by sources outside of the IAU, usually along with the designation, but even for many stars with traditional names the designation is more common. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * alright, i had an idea
 * (sorry it took me so long to respond, I forgot lol)
 * so I agree with you now, we should keep the code name designation in the article, but also I think the proper name should be represented a bit more, so I had an idea
 * How about at the planet box at the top, where it says the planet's name (not the title, the box at the side where it says information about the planet) and, for example, instead of saying just "55 cancri e" we said 55 Cancri e / Janssen? that way, the more common designation can still be used, but the proper name is also given more representation, since both names are equally official according to the IAU and should be treated as such. Kypickle (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * so essentially what I want is at the planet box where it says the name of the planet and information about it, there should be the "code" name as well as the proper name, with a slash in the middle to separate them. Alternatively, we could use parenthesis, like this:
 * 55 Cancri e (Janssen)
 * but i thought this design wasn't as good as it didn't make it seem like both names were equal. Also, I wouldn't change anything else, and the article itself would still use the more common designation. So, whatever name is more common will be used in the article itself, but both names will be represented without having to change the article title. Kypickle (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WD 0806-661 b has been accepted
 WD 0806-661 b, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=WD_0806-661_b help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:LTT 9779 b has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LTT 9779 b. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LTT 9779 b has been accepted
 LTT 9779 b, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=LTT_9779_b help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WASP-49b (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WASP-49b and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:WASP-49b Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WASP-49b reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)