User talk:Kyriakos/Archive 2

Concerning Holocaust & Genocide
I was hoping that wikipedia may be able to make a section for Holocaust & Genocide as either a project or portal. I thought that it might be part of the Military project of the History section. Looking for assistance with this. Thanks. I would appreciate comments & assistance to be left on my talk page []. I hope to hear from you soon. Eric Rodrigues.

WikiProject Harry Potter roll-call
Hi there. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Harry Potter participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. Your name has therefore been moved to a "potentially inactive" list. If you still consider yourself an active WikiProject Harry Potter editor, please move your name from the Potentially inactive list to the Active Contributors list. You may also wish to add  to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. Conversely, if you do not wish to be considered a member of the WikiProject, leave your name where it is and it will be moved to the Inactive Contributors section. If you wish to make a clean break with the Project you may move your name to the Known to have left section. Many thanks.

Coordinator election
This is to inform you that you have been re-elected to serve another term as a coordinator of the Military history WikiProject. Congratulations! Kirill 00:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats!
Congrats on your election as an assistant coordinator. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. I wish you luck in the coming term. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 15:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

WPMILHIST Elections
Thank you for your support. It was much appreciated. -- R OGER D AVIES  TALK 16:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Treaty of Devol
Hi Kyriakos! Any assistance is welcomed! So, if you can improve the article, go for it. I do not have any particular instructions. The goal is to keep it featured, and as a revered FA editor, I think I know how it works! Cheers!--Yannismarou 07:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thanks for the kind words. I look forward to working with you for the next 6 monthes. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Good luck. I voted of course b/c you are perfectly fine w/ no problems & others agree as well. If there is zero risk of you doing harm, then even 0.001% risk that you do good outweighs. Nvm. Good luck. : ) (Wikimachine 03:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC))

Congratulations!  Pat Politics rule!  12:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Re
I could be an excellent copy-editor, if I was a native English speaker! Anyway, I'll give it a shot, but you'll definitely need a better copy-editor. Try their League or contact User:Awadewit or User:Ceoil or User:Tony1, although the latter is usually busy. Cheers!--Yannismarou 18:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Miltary history of Greece/Related
fyi, a page you created, Portal:Miltary history of Greece/Related, appears to be an orphan, and a query about it was raised at Portal talk:Military of Greece. John Vandenberg 03:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyedit of Cleomenean War
Hey there. I noticed on Awadewit's talk page that you're looking for a copyeditor for Cleomenean War. I'm no Awadewit, but I am an English teacher, so I'd be willing to have a go at it if you'd like. I can probably start tomorrow (Tuesday 24 Sept). Lemme know if you no longer need the CE and I'll back off. – Scartol  ·  Talk  23:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. It may be tomorrow or maybe a couple of days yet. Sorry for the delay! – Scartol  ·  Talk  01:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've finished my copyedit. I've corrected many things along the way, and also left a number of comments on the talk page. I hope they're helpful. Cheers! – Scartol  ·  Talk  00:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Portal:Military of Greece
It looks just about ready to go. I'd play around with getting the boxes at the bottom to line up a bit more evenly; they're pretty much fixed-size, so you ought to be able to avoid having a big gap in there. Other than that, I can't see any problems with it. Kirill 02:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your support at FAC. Would you like to take a look at: Slavery in ancient Greece? I think Raul654 might be scouting for feedback, and there are only two "votes" after 2 weeks. Best, DrKiernan 13:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

6,000+ edits
Ping! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roger Davies (talk • contribs) 12:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

sparta
The map doesn't really show the territory of the Sparta. Sparta is just lumped in with "independent states".Dejvid 22:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 13:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

copyedit
You wrote: I was wondering if you would be able to copy edit the Battle of Dyrrhachium.


 * I assume you mean Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081). I will indeed be glad to copyedit it, but it may take a couple of days. I'll leave a note here when I'm done. – Scartol  ·  Talk  15:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Done and done. Lemme know if you have questions. – Scartol  ·  Talk  18:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
The article Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) for things needed to be addressed. Victor12 17:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Byzantine-Seljuk wars GA Sweeps Review: On Hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Conflicts, battles and military exercises" articles. I have reviewed Byzantine-Seljuk wars and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 07:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

recruitment
Hi Kyriakos

I'm trying to get the WikiProject History on track and I need some competent support, so I'm trying to recruit some good editors. Greetings Wandalstouring 14:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * There is a current controversy whether military history articles should not be tagged as history articles. Please wait until this dispute is finished. Wandalstouring 13:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

CHERUB books
Hi. I appreciate your work on the CHERUB article and the CHERUB books. But do you think you might find independent sources? Looking at the official website of a book (or a film or whatever) as a source to testify its success is not the most independent and impartial way to assess it... Happy editing, Goochelaar 10:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 15:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Józef Piłsudski
In the past you have commented in MILHIST A-class review on this article. Perhaps you could comment on it in the FAC process? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 03:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Tagging
Good to see you back at it! I hope things are easier for you at school. All the best, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 13:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and Happy New Year
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.

Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any extra articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.

Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.

Thanks again for your help, -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 10:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Cretan War (1645-1669), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Noah¢s   ( Talk )  22:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Józef Piłsudski
Since you commented in the last round, please note that the nomination has been restarted. Thanks for the comments and edits so far! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible edit warring on project article
There seems to be some issues going on over on the article : Military history of African Americans, in particularly in the section Military history of African Americans. Could you take a look at the article's edit history as well as the discussion, Talk:Military history of African Americans, and possibly give some input? Thanks. Sf46 (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello. You may have seen that some Wikipedia articles lack sources to given dates, timelines and chronologies. If you feel that you could like to help in making all articles more reliable and well sourced in this regard, we would like to encourage you to use, as part of your daily editing and when fact is not enough for requesting clearly and specifically a citation or source for dates, timeline or chronology, the following inline tag:
 * Timefact displays {chronology source needed} for requesting timelines, dates and chronology sources. Click  here for more information

At WP Timeline Tracer, we thank you for using these tools and for helping to make Wikipedia articles more accurate and reliable.  Dao ken  11:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

A bit overdue ...
With four featured articles under your belt, you really deserve this:

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

coordinator election
The Wikiproject History is going to elect 3 coordinators. As a member you are invited to participate. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

coordinator election
The Wikiproject History is going to elect 3 coordinators. As a member you are invited to participate. Wandalstouring (talk) 10:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

link to afd discussion
Hi. In James Adams (CHERUB) you linked to an incorrect afd discussion. Best, -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Cleomenean War
I think it's more-or-less ready at this point; some technical cleanup of things like the footnote formatting might be worthwhile, but that's minor. The only point that I'd concern myself with is the heavy reliance on primary sources. You need to be sure that you can justify following them directly rather than filtering them through secondary sources, as it's quite possible the question will come up at FAC.

Cheers! Kirill 13:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

MILHIST coordinator election
It's my pleasure to inform you that you have been elected to serve as an Assistant Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject for the next six months. Congratulations!

If you have not already done so, please visit the coordinators' talk page, where you'll be able to find some open tasks as well as reference material and discussions relevant to you. You might also be interested in a bit of advice that I have to offer.

Again, congratulations, and good luck! Kirill 00:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!
Congrats on your re-election as an Assistant Coordinator of the Military history Wikiproject. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. I wish you luck in the coming term. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well done Kyriakos. I wish you another six months of happy military mopping, more good times reading articles at WP:MHR and success with your own article writing on Greek military history. And hopefully another big period of growth for WP:MILHIST. Blnguyen  (vote in the photo straw poll ) 04:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot, same wishes for you also! --Eurocopter (talk) 12:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations! and Good Luck! -- S M S  Talk 16:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

please check grammar
could you please check whether the English plural of ballista is ballistae or ballistas and same for old Greek. Thanks Wandalstouring (talk) 12:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

 * I wish to thank you for your support in my unsuccessful bid at becoming an Assistant Coordinator for the Military history WikiProject. Rest assured that I will still be around, probably even more than before, and I have the utmost confidence in the abilities of the current and new coordinators. I might also mention that I am already planning on running again in August. As always, if you need anything, just get in touch. -MBK004 21:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Imperial triple crown jewels
Thank you for contributions to the project, Great work, especially on War against Nabis (FYI: There is a weird templates for deletion notice at the top of that article that could be misplaced?). May you wear the crowns well. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Leo J. Meyer
Please have a look at the DRV for Leo J. Meyer (currently seen at User:Meyerj) located at Deletion review/Log/2008 March. Its my opinion that the article met the standards for verifiability and notability. I would appreciate your input into the matter. MrPrada (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Damn fine idea

 * My pleasure :))) -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 07:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Reveiw request
Sorry, I can't take on any new review or copyedit requests right now. Apologies aplenty. – Scartol  •  Tok  12:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Slade Cutter review
If you don't mind, could you tell me what additional referencing is needed? I thought it was relatively well cited, but someone else can see what is actually there, as opposed to what is still in my head but I thought I put into the article.

Thanks! Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Shouldn't be a problem; each of those is mentioned in the Naval Historical Center document, IIRC. I'll go check. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. I'm glad you reminded me to check. One of the sources was from Time magazine, but I had missed putting "journal" into the citation, where it now shows.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)