User talk:Kyrosnag

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 5), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Azealia 911  talk  02:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Azealia 911  talk  02:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 4).  Azealia 911  talk  02:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Could you at least tell me why you're constantly reverting edits made to the page? Please?  Azealia 911  talk  02:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Could you please tell me why you just deleted what I said to you on here and replaced it with you asking me to explain o_o I just said the "Miss C" block is unnecessary for the pages, considering the fact that the blocks simply being aqua in color is enough to get the point across of who won Miss Congeniality, an extra block is pointless and not needed. I'm attempting to a pointless change made by someone else and you keep reverting it for some reason. Kyrosnag (talk) 02:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete anything you put...but one of the most incredibly annoying things is editors constantly reverting without leaving reason why, I'd really appreciate you using WP:Edit summarys in the future. Secondly, a new block isn't pointless. None of the contestants who won Miss C were awarded it in the episode they were eliminated, having the last block they participated in hightlighted may make readers think that. All winners are awarded in reunions, so I see no point why you're constantly reverting it.  Azealia 911  talk  02:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, I've withdrawn my report of you I made, sorry, I was being hasty  Azealia 911  talk  02:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Um if you say so, but when I hit publish it posted with your comment so I guess Wikipedia ate it :| and having their eliminated block designate the fact that they won Miss Congeniality made no one think they won it in the episode they were eliminated. There was nothing wrong with the way it was before. So I see no point why you're constantly reverting it. Kyrosnag (talk) 02:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Was probably a random edit conflict, they happen, no my point is, every block and coulour represents a contestants outcome that episode (Like WIN, HIGH, BTM2) so could you not see how having the box lit could make people think that?  Azealia 911  talk  03:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Honestly if people dont understand simply enough with the reunion episode summary simply saying "both "America's Next Drag Superstar" and "Miss Congeniality" are crowned" then they probably shouldn't be reading the page anyway lol Kyrosnag (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha, I do see your point, but it's pivotal that we make wiki easy enough for a 6 year old to understand, also, sorry for the many warnings, I know you were editing in good faith!  Azealia 911  talk  03:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)