User talk:KzKrann/Archive

Speedy deletion nomination of Evgeni Levkin
A tag has been placed on Evgeni Levkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bento00 (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Im fucking tiegbf
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Im fucking tiegbf, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ski jumpng venues in Canada
A tag has been placed on Category:Ski jumpng venues in Canada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KzKrann (talk) 19:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kakhaber Tsakadze


The article Kakhaber Tsakadze has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RandomStringOfCharacters  [T]  01:47, 15 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I've added some sources, please remove the tag. KzKrann (talk) 01:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Archives
Hi KzKrann. Sorry about that. I must have not noticed the archive. I don't see the link on your user page; could you direct me to the link of the archives? --Can You Prove That You&#39;re Human (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * User talk:KzKrann/Archive. KzKrann (talk) 02:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Klemens Murańka
A tag has been placed on Klemens Murańka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but, "but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia".. What? That's bullshit. KzKrann (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Klemens Murańka
I have nominated Klemens Murańka, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Klemens Murańka. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 04:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Einsiedeln Eschbach ski jumps
Hello! Your submission of Einsiedeln Eschbach ski jumps at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have some further comments about this nomination. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of songs mentioning Illuminati


The article List of songs mentioning Illuminati has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Overcategorization

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shashwat986 (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Schanzen Einsiedeln
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Excentric (band)
A tag has been placed on Excentric (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  19:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry but, no. I don't agree. Two albums and articles on both german and swedish wikipedia is more than enough. KzKrann (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If you can supply reliable sources that demonstrate the bands notability, then there are no problems with re-creating the article. I nominated it for deletion on the basis that there was no credible assertion of notability in the article, no sourcing, and my own work looking for sourcing on Google turned up nothing. This is not at all to say that sourcing doesn't exist, and if you can find it and add it to a re-created article there's no reason to think the article will be deleted a second time, assuming the sources are reliable. Thanks. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  21:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I want it recreated at User:Kzkrann/Excentric please. KzKrann (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not an administrator, so I cannot help you with this request. You may want to contact the administrator who handled the deletion and see if he can be of assistance. Best of luck! ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  19:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Message: I am writing some short stubs about ski jumping venues right now. I will expand them when i've got the time to do that.


 * Archive

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, KzKrann! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Pilif12p (contribs) 13:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Speedy deletion nomination of Fuck NWO
A tag has been placed on Fuck NWO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Zhernovoi (talk) 23:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Alaska Central Express Flight 22
I have nominated Alaska Central Express Flight 22, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alaska Central Express Flight 22. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. YSSYguy (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Lorentz & M.Sakarias for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Lorentz & M.Sakarias, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lorentz & M.Sakarias until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Snotty Wong  speak 22:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stor


The article Stor has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Tomas e (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  21:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Majuba Aviation crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majuba Aviation crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Majuba Aviation crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

The AfD nom was not made by myself, I'm just posting this as a courtesy to you. Mjroots (talk) 05:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Alaska Central Express Flight 22
I've fully protected Alaska Central Express Flight 22 and ACE Flight 22 to prevent the recreation of the article against consensus. If an article is deleted at AfD and you wish to recreate it, then WP:DRV is the correct avenue to go down. I would say that this accident does not meet WP:AIRCRASH standards to sustain an individual article, and that any DRV is unlikely to succeed due to the size of the aircraft involved. Even accidents involving large aircraft such as the ATR-72 sometimes get deleted. A DRV following the discovery of fresh information does not always get the AFD overturned. In these cases, you just have to accept the consensus is against you. Mjroots (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarahn Chizabica


The article Sarahn Chizabica has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Doza


A tag has been placed on Doza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 06:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Majuba Aviation crash


The article Majuba Aviation crash has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notable (Wikipedia article) people killed; no known changes to procedures or regulations as the result fo the crash. Non-notable aircrash.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 18:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Majuba Aviation crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majuba Aviation crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Majuba Aviation crash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Bushranger One ping only 18:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Tajik National Guard Helicopter crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tajik National Guard Helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tajik National Guard Helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. William 12:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chiria Puštov


A tag has been placed on Chiria Puštov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WarlordFrederick (talk) 23:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have nominated it on AfD for community consensus on deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. When you recently edited Chiria Puštov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tajik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarahn Chizabica


A tag has been placed on Sarahn Chizabica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KzKrann (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dick DIck Dick


A tag has been placed on Dick DIck Dick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 16:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Puss chira


A tag has been placed on Puss chira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  16:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jet One Express air crash


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jet One Express air crash, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andrew Kurish (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Jet One Express air crash article
This article as it stands is clearly nonsense - a flight from Tymen to Surgut crashing in Puerto Rico! Even marked "under construction", we don't want something like that visible in the encyclopedia. On the chance that you are adapting another article, I have userfied it for you to User:KzKrann/Jet One Express air crash where you can sort it out.

Your talk page has a worrying list of warnings about deleted articles. Please take Wikipedia seriously, and read WP:Your first article before you make any more. If "Jet One Express air crash" is some kind of joke or hoax, please mark the userfied page with db-user so it can be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I userfied this article for you to work on - as it stood, it was nonsense: it described a flight from Roschino to Surgut, both in Russia, which crashed in Puerto Rico; the aircraft was stated to be a CV-340 but the picture was an ATR-72; and there was no text, only an info box. We do not want nonsense in the encyclopedia, even marked "under construction". I userfied it so that you could work on it and make it a proper article, but you have done nothing to it for three months and now moved it back, unchanged, into the encyclopedia. So I have deleted it. I will restore it to your user space for you to work on if you assure me that (a) you have read WP:AIRCRASH and the WP:GNG and have enough sources to show that this is notable enough to have an article, and (b) you will complete work on it in your user space before posting it again. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fack aina


A tag has been placed on Fack aina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Slon02 (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 01:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miriama Kunkelova


The article Miriama Kunkelova has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Electric Catfish 12:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miriama Kunkelova


A tag has been placed on Miriama Kunkelova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gustav Fasa


The article Gustav Fasa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 08:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. When you recently edited Gustav Fasa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Bowers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ski jumping team Bulgaria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ski jumping team Bulgaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ski jumping team Bulgaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KzKrann (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)