User talk:L.K.amila

January 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Belvedere (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Edit susummaries
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I will try L.K.amila (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 09:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and it appears you have been using a computer program to make edits which have ranged from disruptive to neutral to occasionally useful. To pick a random example of the former, This edit to "Don't Turn Off the Lights" shows staggering incompetence. Also, despite saying you'd try to increase your use of edit summaries above, in the month of March none of your 221 edits contained one. You are not welcome here. Graham 87 09:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

.
 * 4% of 176 isn't that much better than 0% of 221 ... Graham 87 11:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)