User talk:L.tak/Archives/2017 1

Cloem
Hi L.tak. Could you perhaps have a look at the article Cloem, a little-known company apparently creating computer-generated claims, "based upon a client’s submitted claim set"? The Afd I initiated failed. Apparently, there would be "non-trivial sources," but the article is stuffed with original research... Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Brrr, I had a look, and looked at the AFD. I am not sure if this should have been deleted, but the non-deletion articles were not very strong, especially when saying wp:org doesn't apply. There is much to be done, but it is not an easy fix I am afraid. I'll see what I can do in the next weeks. L.tak (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Edcolins (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
—David Levy 17:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Are you still interested in commenting on this matter? --George Ho (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, not particularly. I am not very competent in this regards (as long as it gives no precedents for svn-maps, where the parameter really helps in display quality)... L.tak (talk) 22:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens for Constitutional Freedom
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Citizens for Constitutional Freedom. Thanks. Reinoutr (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ward (sheriff)
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/David Ward (sheriff). Thanks. Reinoutr (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Euraasian unioni?
Why in the Finnish Wikipedia the article Eurasian Economic Union has named Euraasian unioni, although it should be Euraasian talousunioni? --2001:999:20:3170:4F7:CD9D:3356:FC7 (talk) 18:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no idea, and (as I don't speak Finnish) I am not sure if you are right. However, if you are right, you probably can move the page to the right location, using the "move" button at the top, after you made an account and made some edits... L.tak (talk) 20:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As it is known, the "Eurasian Union" does not exist (at least not at the moment). Instead, the Eurasian Economic Union is. In Finnish the "Eurasian Union" is "Euraasian unioni", but the name is missing word economy, in Finnish talous: the Eurasian Economic Union is in Euraasian talousunioni in Finnish.
 * However, it is impossible to change the name, due to some kind of 'dictatorship' of some administrators in the Finnish Wikipedia: The difference between the "Eurasian Union" versions (2nd January 2015), Discussion: Euraasian unioni  , The difference between the "Eurasian Union" versions (4th April 2016)  . --85.76.161.185 (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Gerrit Schotte
Dear L.tak,

In response to your message, I on the other hand kindly request to you that YOU stop YOUR disruptive editing of information. It is YOU at this moment that is VANDALIZING the said Wiki page of Gerrit Schotte because the information you are posting is misleading and is not based on facts.

To be more specific, within Curaçao Law, once a person appeals a verdict, that verdict becomes non-existent.

Every person under Curaçao Law has the right to 3 trials. 1. Gerecht in Eerste Aanleg (Court in First Instance) 2. Hoger Beroep (Court of Appeal presided by 3 judges) 3. Cassatie (Supreme Court under the Dutch Kingdom presided in The Netherlands)

Once a verdict is giving under the Court of First Instance, the prosecution or the defense (depending on who is the losing party) both have the right to appeal. Once the verdict is appealed, the verdict becomes non-existent and the process is restarted from the beginning in the Court of Appeal. The same rights apply when a verdict from the Court of Appeal is appealed. The verdict becomes non-existent and the process is restarted under the Supreme Court (Cassatie).

Please refer to below Laws.

Wetboek van Strafvordering Curaçao

Artikel 437

1. Het hoger beroep moet worden ingesteld:

a. indien de dagvaarding om ter terechtzitting te verschijnen de verdachte in persoon is betekend of de verdachte ter terechtzitting is verschenen, binnen veertien dagen na de einduitspraak; b. in andere gevallen, uiterlijk veertien dagen nadat zich een omstandigheid heeft voorgedaan, waaruit voortvloeit dat het vonnis de verdachte bekend is.

2. Is in het geval, bedoeld in het eerste lid, onderdeel a, hetonderzoek op de terechtzitting voor onbepaalde tijd geschorst en de oproeping om op de nadere terechtzitting te verschijnen niet aan de verdachte in persoon betekend, dan kan, behoudens het geval dat de verdachte alsnog op de nadere zitting is verschenen, het hoeger beroep worden ingesteld uiterlijk veertien dagen nadat zich een omstandigheid heeft voorgedaan, waaruit voortvloeit dat het vonnis de verdachte bekend is.

Rijkswet Cassatierechtspraak voor Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en voor Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba.

§ 3. Cassatie in strafzaken ingesteld door partijen

Artikel 10

1. Partijen kunnenin strafzaken geen beroep in cassatie instellen tegen beschikkingen. 2. De verdachte kan geen beroep in cassatie instellen tegen bij verstek gewezen vonnissen. 3. Voor het openbaar ministerie wordt een beroep in cassatie ingesteld door een procureur-generaal bij het Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maartenen van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba.

Artikel 11

1. Voor het instellen van hetberoep in cassatie staat deverdachte en een procureur-generaa bij het Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en voor Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba een termijn open van veertien dagen. Bij algemene maatregel van rijksbestuur kan een langere termijn worden vastgesteld voor gevallen, waarin de verdachte geen woonplaats heeft op het eiland waar de beslissing, waartegen beroep in cassatie wordt ingesteld, is uitgesproken. 2. Alvorens de stukken van het geding aan de griffier van de Hoge Raard worden gezonden, wordt aan de raadsman van de verdachte, indien hij dit verzoekt, gelegenheid gegeven de stukken in te zien. 3. Aanzegging en kennisgevingen als voorgeschreven in titel III van het derde Boek van het Wetboek van Strafvordering van het Europese deel van de Koninkrijk geschieden op de in Aruba, Curaçao en Sint Maarten en in de openbare lichamen Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba gebruikelijke wijze, en, voor zover zij moeten uitgaan van de procureur-generaal bij het Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FGarcia12 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for going to the talk page. I will move the part about the law to the talk:Gerrit Schotte page, where I will react and where other may weigh in. L.tak (talk) 05:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BeneluxParliamentLogo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:BeneluxParliamentLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 10:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Gerda, Wow that long ago! I must say it is still a good memory to me on how a discussion can be on a tense subject without becoming personal... L.tak (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I feel the same! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Infobox European case
Unlike the old infobox, the infobox you inserted into Zakharov v. Russia does not display all judges. Is there a way to make them show up? Also, is there a way to make the ECLI number display in a shorter way? It makes the whole box very wide, which looks weird. – Anetek (talk) 22:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The number of judges is solved now, thanks for letting me know. The ECLI is however very large in echr cases, which is regrettable... I could see if I can get the typeface smaller, or remove the " ECLI" heading in front of it, or break it off, all of which have their disadvantages as well. What do you think? L.tak (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)