User talk:L0st H0r!z0ns

L0st H0r!z0ns, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Jtmorgan and HostBot. Thanks for the invite. I've had a look, and will come back if I have any problems/questions. tH0r (talk contribs) 14:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

A cookie for you!
Thanks, Lor. My favourite!! How did you know? Feedback always welcome. tH0r (talk contribs) 12:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form -- most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Also if I may note, we don't usually enforce American or British spellings here, and I have found other users can get quite tchy when spelling is changed from one to the other. It's great to have another editor editing amongst us, but I'd avoid those changes as you are bound to run into needless trouble. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Tom (LT). Many thanks for the welcome message.  I look forward to checking out the WikiProject Anatomy page.  Regarding the changes I made, it's not a question of American or British spelling.  "Mucous" and "mucus" are two different words... "mucous" is an adjective of the word "mucus".  Many thanks again for the welcome message.  tH0r (talk contribs) 09:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Streptomyces verticillus has been accepted
 Streptomyces verticillus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:L0st_H0r!z0ns help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bugula neritina has been accepted
 Bugula neritina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 21:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:L0st_H0r!z0ns help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thank you for your efforts at
...Natural product. Your participation is appreciated, in that for-too-long abandoned article. Someday, after a conflicting editor retires, I may return to assist you. I am a big fan of broad, secondary source-based editing that results in articles presenting the preponderance of scientific opinion. Good luck with your work there. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi 71.239.87.100,


 * I haven't done very much, but thanks. It would be nice to see Natural product make good article status, but it needs a chemist and someone with a good overview of the subject to work on it.  I'll tidy the biology stuff up as time permits.  I do try to use secondary or tertiary sources where I can.  This is almost always possible for the Natural product page because it's such a big subject, but more difficult for the wikilinked/spinoff pages like Amycolatopsis rifamycinica or Bugula neritina.  If you spot me making any mistakes, please let me know.  Hope you can return to the page soon.


 * Thanks,


 * tH0r (talk contribs) 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations
There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the invite, Guy. Sorry for the delay replying. tH0r (talk contribs) 13:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Guy. --tH0r (talk contribs) 14:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erythropodium caribaeorum has been accepted
 Erythropodium caribaeorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Onel 5969  TT me 12:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Erythropodium_caribaeorum help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Discodermia dissoluta has been accepted
 Discodermia dissoluta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  07:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Discodermia_dissoluta help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Village pump (policy)

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:


 * 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:


 * 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Guy. tH0r (talk contribs) 11:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:ELNEVER
Please do be mindful of this. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Jytdog,


 * Many thanks for the information. I had thought Zenodo was one of the more respectable repositories, but I guess any of these websites (ResearchGate, academia.edu, etc.) are only as copyright compliant as the authors uploading their articles. I'll be more careful in future.


 * Thanks,


 * tH0r (talk contribs) 11:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antibiotic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adhesin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks, DPL bot!
 * tH0r (talk contribs) 10:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)