User talk:L2212

Welcome!
Hello, L2212, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Tharros has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 06:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Tharros
Note this would need academic sources. Doug Weller talk 06:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Sardinian people page
Hi L2212, you've been lucky. I'd been thinking the every-IP-changing guy would tell you you're just an evil nationalist, instead he/she thinks you are me with another account. Frankly, I don't know if I should be amused or anything at this point. What do you think? :D--Dk1919 (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course, even Xoil and ItaloCelt would be part of the weird and evil Sardinian nationalist gom plot to to declare the island's independence on Wikipedia by that guy's reasoning! Buahahaha! [evil laughs] :D Seriously, I don't know if he/she's trolling on everyone or anything. XD--Dk1919 (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I noted your sarcastical comment you've just posted :D If there is anything I may possibly suggest, try not to fuel the troll's flame. Rule of the thumb when dealing with this kind of users is that, in case they run out of arguments, they resort to this last thing, unfortunately.--Dk1919 (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

IP user
Hi L22, thank you for adding more sources. It seems the anonymous IP guy has finally created an account of his/her own. Maybe he/she's not in bad faith, after all. I posted a long comment on the user's talk page, I can't wait for a reply. I hope the discussion will be civil, and a compromise be reached. :) --Dk1919 (talk) 15:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi L22! I'm sorry, but upon further notice I had to remove one of your sources (Minaham's book, to be precise), the reason being that the concept of "stateless nation" (basically a historically defined territory with a long-standing autonomist or separatist movement promoted by at least a fraction of the people involved) is imbued with politics and is not interchangeable with the one of "ethnic group" or "native people", which is neutral. As I said and you also agreed, the issue is about mere anthropology. As for the rest of the sources you added, the other two are ok, thanks again for adding them and your work!--Dk1919 (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Demonyms
Hi, L2212. To understand my demonym edits, please see Template talk:Infobox settlement. For settlement infoboxes, we're supplementing four of the parameters with their plurals. Thus, we now have population_demonym which will display as Demonym: and population_demonyms which will display as Demonyms:. The Demonym(s): label will go away when I've converted everything. —hike395 (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Ah, ok, I get it. Thank you very much for the informations, I've seen that it works now.--L2212 (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Page moves
Hey there!

I noticed you've recently moved eight pages. Thank you for your contributions, but moves that are likely to be contested require consensus to be gained first at requested moves. I've undone the moves for now, but if you need any help setting up the discussion, let me know and I'd be more than happy to assist.

Happy editing,

 SITH   (talk)   21:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Giogu sardu de botza
Oé L2212, eja, apo como bidu e votau. Non chi bozat narrere nudda, semus chistionande de it.wiki, unu locu politicizau meda pro cussu chi calicunu pessat comente "localismo". As a bìere chi at a acabbare comente a sa pagina de sos Sardos, chi apo defesu e in ube apo perdiu unu muntone de tempus petzi pro mi la bìere serrada pro semper. Fintzas a cando b'at a essere in ibe utentes "uguales" e ateros "prus uguales" galu, it.wiki at a abbarrare su chi est.--Dk1919 (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Ite t'apo nadu? Che l'ant bogada.--Dk1919 (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Non credo chi bi nd'at apiu, ma a lis narrere cosa est imbolare tempus, ca s'arresonu fiat pro forma. Apo imparau chi it.wiki gai funtzionat, a dolu mannu: e mi dispiachet, ma non m'ispanto, cando bido chi sunt perdende iscritos ativos. E ite boles fachere ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Dk1919 (talk) 18:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giants of Mont'e Prama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Aghlabids. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 16:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Kingdom of Sardinia
Hello, why did revert my edit in Kingdom of Sardinia ? איתן קרסנטי (talk) 09:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry for the late reply but I didn't have time for Wikipedia these last few days. Anyway, I reverted it because the use of that flag it's quite confusing, because while it was created while the Kingdom's name was still "Kingdom of Sardinia" it was made in preparation for the name change, and it's more connected to the Kingdom of Italy. Now here on Wikipedia we have two kingdoms with the same flag, and for the Kingdom of Sardinia it would be better to use an unambiguous flag that represented it for a longer time, considering that we are talking about a Kingdom that lasted more than 500 years and whose main flag is still used today, and also that there is no official policy for necessarily using the last flag a Kingdom used, as far as I know at least. L2212 (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Unu saludu
Salude L2212, apo bidu chi mi aias lassadu una mail tempus faghet. No apo nde apo tentu propiu, e (a dolu mannu) non pesso chi nd'apo a dedicare belle prus a su progetu de Wikipedia (cumprendende cussa in sardu, limba nostra istimada). Apo bidu giustu una cosigheddda o duas dae s'urtima borta chi nde fia essidu, e at a esser s'urtimu (creo) chi fago inoghe. Custu lu cheria narrere pro onestade, sicomente (a como) so "amministradore" de su progetu in sardu (dae ue mi nde podes bogare). Tando, ti cheria dare unu saludu e abbratzu mannu pro su chi as fatu e sighis a faghere, che a titulu. Est istada una isperientzia bella! Dk1919 (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Still, ideas on Wp/sro needed
Thank you for inputing on this matter, and I respect your action on undoing Fausta Samaritani's linking to their own Incubator test (as linked at this section title), but that Incubator test still exists, so I wonder what's the correct way to handle content duplicating? Should I nominate Wp/sro on Incubator for deletion? Or connive their "contributions" so if more active comes, there would be possible that a separate sro.wikipedia get created? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You are welcome and thank you very much for your help and for looking after this issue, unfortunately it is often difficult to deal with editors like this who are as stubborn as they are uncooperative. In my opinion the best course of action would be to delete it, since the creation of such a project would damage the existence of sc.wiki (we already have few editors and articles as it is) and the fact that until her arrival Wp/sro had exactly zero pages except for the main one (for 10 years) tells us how an hypothetical sro.wiki would end up. Plus I can imagine that if that wiki were approved, according to her "constellation of wikis" concept, she would then start pushing for a Logudorese wiki as well (as she has already done with her request) and then probably a Nuorese one and many, many others for every single dialect. L2212 (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)