User talk:L337m4n/Archive 4

There is nothing in discogs that states a table is required
So please stop insisting it is. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * You clearly did not fully read the guidelines. Here is a link directly to the section that mentions the use of a table. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 22:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Warning
Please note the warning I left you at WP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Cr1TiKaL. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * "4. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language."
 * This is one of the exemptions of the three-revert rule. Bobby690 has continued to vandalize Cr1TiKaL as well as several other articles. The good news is that he usually just leaves the articles alone after his edits are reverted; the bad news is that he really wanted to get in on it with me, so he did, and it resulted in both of us being blocked. Luckily, after his block, he has left Cr1TiKaL alone, but now, he's at KSI most likely attempting to start another edit war. Also, I will be requesting higher-level protection on Cr1TiKaL.
 * KullyKeemaKa (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Accusing other editors of vandalism without evidence is considered a personal attack. If you have diffs demonstrating vandalism, provide them. I see no evidence that Bobby is edit-warring at KSI. His last edit there was two days ago.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I saw a guideline on disruptive editing, which seems not to be confused with vandalism. Maybe I used the incorrect guideline, so allow me to rephrase what I said before; Bobby seems to be sort of disruptive (not too much, but definitely a little bit) according to his contributions. I have seen the history of those articles, and about 99% of his edits have been reverted. Also, from what I have seen, it seems like Bobby has left KSI alone, which is good.
 * Anyway, Cr1TiKaL; when Bobby reverted my edits, the note was poorly sourced, and a certain part—the pronunciation for Cr1TiKaL—was slightly poorly grammatical. Because of stuff like this as well as his poor reasoning (and some vandalism by other people as well), I have requested semi-protection for Cr1TiKaL.
 * KullyKeemaKa (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dream SMP (May 23)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dream_SMP Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Anarchyte was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is simply not enough information on this topic external to Dream (YouTuber) to warrant a separate article. Much of this information could be added to that article.

Anarchyte ( talk ) 16:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

"MonsterCr1TiKaL" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect MonsterCr1TiKaL. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Apologies
I blocked you for a week because I mistakenly thought you had restored your version of Cr1TiKaL since your 48-hour block expired. I have unblocked you with a notation of the error in the block log. Very sorry. That said, the other user did restore their version of the article, and I have blocked them for a week. Do not restore your version, or you will be blocked. If you think the current version is wrong, then you need to get a consensus for that view on the article Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It's no worries, I will advise politely to stop adding or removing content without providing a source. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I left a message on Bobby690's talk page, as well as Cr1TiKaL's talk page. I will be waiting for answers to the penguinz0 topic. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry
for behaving a bit weirdly at Talk:Dream SMP server, I was genuinely confused at what you were trying to do as I'm not too experienced with moves and might have come across as a bit aggressive. Happy editing, 15 (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it, I'm just as new as you are. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Steve Terreberry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Terreberry, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Steve Terreberry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Cash (musician) (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Cash (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Cash (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Steve_Cash_(musician) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spicy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Steve_Cash_(musician) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 06:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)