User talk:LC1973

March 2017
Regarding Andrés Silva: I did not say that you should modify an existing citation to claim that Silva was exonerated. I am looking at the reference you're changing right now. It says nothing about exoneration. It says "6 months ineligibility". If you can find a reliable source that states that Silva was eventually exonerated, please do add it to the article. But please do not blank out cited information, or (worse) try to change what the citation says. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I speak Spanish. The article you cite opens "Se confirmó en el laboratorio de Madrid que la segunda muestra realizada al atleta uruguayo tenía 6-OXO (anabólico). Comenzarán investigación para dilucidar cómo llegó la sustancia al organismo de Silva." I would translate this as "It was confirmed in the Madrid laboratory that the second sample taken from the Urugayan athlete had 6-OXO (anabolic). An investigation was begun to determine how that substance arrived in his body." This says nothing about exoneration. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 03:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I am in Uruguay and Is not POSITIVE is adverso. Se comprobó que fue una ingesta por producto contaminado. La cita no describe la realidad. https://www.google.com.uy/?gws_rd=ssl#q=andres+silva+adverso&*
 * Tal vez la cita no describe la realidad, pero la cita decribe la cita. Wikipedia tiene una política fundamental: "Verifiability, not truth" ("verificabilidad, no verdad"). I am glad that you are willing to discuss this, but you must find a citation that plainly states that Silva was exonerated. We have to report faithfully what the sources say.
 * Also, your search gives headlines such as "Andrés Silva: resultado adverso también en la segunda muestra". In English, that's "Andrés Silva: adverso result also in the second sample." In other words, both samples were the same: esa descripción indica que el resultado de ambos muestras era lo mismo. And it is obvious that the first sample was positive, otherwise there wouldn't be a second sample. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * See also this: Muestra B confirma positivo de Andrés Silva ("Sample B Confirms Positive for Andrés Silva").


 * At this point, I'm going to stop editing. I suggest that you do the same: te sugiero que ceses también. We are both in violation of the three-revert rule. I apologize for that! If you still disagree with me, we should find a third editor who is not involved and ask that person to clarify. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)