User talk:LDHLontz

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Please be careful what you add to an article like Minnesota Nice is based on sources that can be cited, and not on observation. If you have questions, please ask. Jonathunder 05:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for CLV contributions
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions to the Concordia Language Villages article.

I just wanted to let you know that I have flagged a number of claims in the current article as in need of citation. In addition, your criticisms as archived in the recent article history are, while interesting, unverifiable and biased. A sysop may want to archive that history. mitcho/芳貴 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

420 (cannabis culture)
Please try harder to discuss things on the talk page instead before making changes against consensus. Wikipedia follows a series of rules including WP:OR, WP:Verifiability and WP:Consensus. A complete list of these policies can be found at WP:POLICIES. HighInBC 13:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello, please sign your posts
In order for other editors to see who made which post on a talk page, please follow each comment with ~. This will put your username and the time/date. When you do not, other editors have to and sign it for you, this is possible as your username is associated with the edit in the document history. For more information about this see WP:SIG. Thanks for your contributions. HighInBC 16:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Blair Witch
Please consult "What wikipedia is not", and it is definitely not a fan site, with unsourcable information about fan created parodies, neologisms, and basically what you listed. Their main problem is it is nearly impossible to establish either their significence or their verifiability. Judgesurreal777 12:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cotter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cotter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Concordia Language Village Evergreen Award
A "" template has been added to the article Concordia Language Village Evergreen Award, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dhartung | Talk 07:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:1800's_Sugar_Loaf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1800's_Sugar_Loaf.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 17:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)