User talk:LDinushakck

Speedy deletion nomination of Udadumbara
A tag has been placed on Udadumbara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: The same applies to Uda owita and Udispattuwa. They will be deleted if content is not forthcoming. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed. Since both article have been empty for two weeks now, I have proposed them both for deletion under G3 as well. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 14:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)