User talk:LED65

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Big Rip has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –  iride scent  20:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of BSA Troop 37
A tag has been placed on BSA Troop 37 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 21:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

If the troop has received significant media coverage, or is unique in some way that can be documented (Oldest troop in United States, largest, etc.), then that might show that the troop is notable. In the absence of that, though... it might not meet our criteria for inclusion. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 21:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of BSA Troop 37
A tag has been placed on BSA Troop 37 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dark Mage 21:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Mysdaao talk 21:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Fox Valley Bible Church
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fox Valley Bible Church, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/fox-valley-bible-church.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fox Valley Bible Church
A tag has been placed on Fox Valley Bible Church, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please do not try to keep inserting articles after they have been rejected, without improving them. But an individual Boy Scout troop or local church is the sort of organization that has no intrinsic claim of notability in general, and something particular most be specified -- and to keep the article here, backed up by 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases). Please see our guide to writing Wikipedia articles for some basic information about what's needed. If you keep re-adding these articles, I warn you that you will be blocked. DGG (talk) 23:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Only a very few Boy Scout units meet the standards of WP:Notability, and you have not shown that Troop 37 is any more notable than any other troop. Please review WikiProject Scouting/MOS and you will find information on writing Scouting article within the context of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --—— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  14:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)