User talk:LEIXUEBING

Speedy deletion nomination of Universe time law
Hello LEIXUEBING,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Universe time law for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

No original research
Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to publish new discoveries. The role of an encyclopedia is only to summarise material that has already been published in reliable sources. See the policy No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery." You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction, and you may find ideas about somewhere to publish your work at Alternative outlets. JohnCD (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Universe time law
Hello LEIXUEBING,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Universe time law for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LouiseS1979 (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)