User talk:LFPRESS

Nomination of Lauren Lakis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Lakis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ewan Bourne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ewan Bourne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Potential conflict of interest
Hello, LFPRESS. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have to ask, because I've enough reason to suspect it. Are you editing on behalf of Monroe Studios/Legacy Features? I'm asking because your name shares the same initials as Legacy Features. Please be aware that this is a conflict of interest and can be seen as advertising, considering that you might be involved with the company. There's nothing that says you absolutely cannot edit, but it does mean that it's discouraged and that you might want to go through the film WikiProject rather than make edits yourself. It's just very easy to take things personally when you are involved with the subject of an article and potentially stand to gain from it being added or deleted on Wikipedia. I'm not trying to be harsh, just say that I have reason to suspect this and you're taking the deletion discussions a little personally.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)