User talk:LIUCtheo8

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, LIUCtheo8. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page O'Sulloc Tea, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''This does not mean you will be banned/blocked, nor is this in any way certain - I have very little way of knowing if you do work for O'Sulloc. It is simply a reminder of one of Wikipedia's policies.'' Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message! All of us who worked on the page, O'Sulloc with the "LIUC" in the name are students at a university and do not work for the company. This topic was brought and chosen since we had some Korean members and thought it'd be interesting but have no conflicts of interest. We found it very difficult throughout the page to keep it non-advertising and we hope there were no advertisements or promotional aspects in the end other than being informative by Wiki standard. Thank you. LIUCtheo8 (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Apologies about this, I didn't see the talk page at first where this was explained - I hope you'll forgive me for not noticing. I've striked through the comment as a result. Sorry once again! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries! I appreciate the updates and double checking for these things. Cheers! LIUCtheo8 (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)