User talk:LJB10001

Hello, LJB10001, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Adding commentary or opinions to articles
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hereford Cathedral. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Also, the edit summary you gave seemed rather facetious, which could give editors the impression that it was vandalism, so it would be much better to stick to using edit summaries that simply state factually what your edit is doing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Some advice on requests for adminship
I see that you have created a requests for adminship for yourself. Editors are considered for possible adminship only if they have an extensive history of editing over a long period, and have demonstrated that they have a sound understanding of administrative issues. There is no chance at all of a request for adminship for you succeeding at present. I suggest that the best thing will be to delete the page for now, with a view to possibly recreating it if you are still interested in becoming an administrator when you have more experience, in a couple of years or so. Would you agree to that? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Current user consensus calls for at least 5000 good edits, ideally made by yourself individually and not by Huggle, Twinkle, etc., participation in admin-related areas (CSD, AfD, ANI, SPI, etc., and an editing history stretching over a year or more. You are fully entitled to apply with less than these parameters, but your chance of success would in that case be less. Probably much less. Anthony Bradbury "talk" 13:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits to Rickenbacker 330
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Rickenbacker 330 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)