User talk:LM2000/Archive 2

Ability: Keen Eye
Whoa, I hadn't noticed that, thanks for the link. I did notice a recent GameFaqs thread though. Starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Whoops
No problemo! I was a bit surprised when that came up in my notifications but I figured it was either a mistake or you had a good reason for it. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Excuse Me
Daddy Day Camp was panned. It has a very low rating on IMBD, and was ranked as the 16 lowest rated film on RT. Are you completely sure? Please inform me if I was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

You're quite active...
I see you have a history. :) I left the Melissa Harris-Perry article be, with no mention at all of her tampon earrings, which I find quite interesting. I did link to the Romney subsection on the main MSNBC page, though. Hope that sits better with you. Cheers. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Millionaire Edit
I made a valid edit on Millionaire. It ORIGINATED in the United Kingdom! Then came to the US as the EXACT same show. Same graphics, same music, same lifelines, same logos, same cash tier, and even almost an exact replica of the original UK stage.

LOOK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0aMrkbUAxQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI2SXUzMFtQ

All I want edited was country of origin. Get your facts right, people! You're supposed to have the "valid information" ...bullcrap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BugleBoi (talk • contribs) 07:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Seethisway SPI
"David"? Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Work Shall be done
Done, I've gotten almost a 100 reliable sources for this article. Honestly, if people could give me a chance I can show them what I can do. -- Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack and Jill (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battlefield Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Abuser
Stop violating Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into articles and stop abusing your rollback rights. --77.70.37.138 (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry to butt in, but what you are accusing simply didn't occur; your changes were reverted, nothing was added by LM2000 (talk). In my experience, LM2000 (talk) has always acted in good faith. Why are you so passionate about moving an article that has been nominated for deletion anyway? Did you consider the fact that you could interrupt the discussion by moving pages that are under review? — Josh3580 talk/hist 22:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I reverted the move because the article under its current name is being nominated for deletion and your redirect removed the nomination tag. Also, the page that you redirected it to has previously been undone by someone else.  Seems controversial, you may want to request a move.  You may want to assume good faith in the future, and also brush up on WP:BLP as Josh points out no BLP violations have occurred here.LM2000 (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Harpalji
Hello LM2000. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Harpalji, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 13:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Giant Haystacks move.
Were you thinking of Haystacks Calhoun? You did help move him recently. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:23, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Meatpuppet Question
No, nobody ever asked me to do anything of the sort. RaveBlack (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Pro Wrestling Community
I didn't want to clutter the AfD by asking, but I wanted to ask someone who was a lot more knowledgeable than me regarding this. I didn't even know there was a wrestling community here until recently, and I would like to contribute in whatever way I can, even if it's just helping to clean up/proofread articles. I have found my way to the project page, but beyond the pages listed there, is there any other reading that I should do before contributing to the community? Thank you in advance for any guidance you can provide this neophyte! RaveBlack (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying to me, and for that page on sources. That seems to be the thing that trips me up in attempting to contribute here beyond just proofreading. Too much time on TVTropes leads one to believe that everything has merit. I have an additional question regarding them: is there an official stance regarding the use of social media as a source, like an official Twitter or Facebook account? One of my past edits was reverted due to attempting to use an official Twitter account as a source, and it wasn't really explained how it wasn't valid then.


 * I understand fully how bad this all looks. I really should be more active, and now that I'm learning what to do and how not to look ridiculous in the process, I'm sure I can be. And even I thought that it was odd how people seemed to appear out of nowhere to vote. RaveBlack (talk) 05:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I now have a lot of reading to do. Thanks again! RaveBlack (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

WWE Countdown
Thanks dude, my first time making a wrestling article so I will try and use these sources in the future. Also thanks for the table fix.

--Moonschool (talk) 03:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * No hard feelings! Upon rereading my edit summary, it sounds a bit more snooty than I intended.  Hopefully no offense was taken.LM2000 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Musdan77 (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
I understand where you're coming from, but the subject of the discussion was whether the urban legend the film bears so many similarities to should be mentioned on the page. That is an appropriate subject for discussion on the talk page per Talk page guidelines. I've left the wipe and will re-phrase the issue more succinctly, because the discussion better resembled an argument. I would ask however, in the future that you try to be more clear on the issue being discussed before making such a wipe. Thank you. MjolnirPants  Tell me all about it.  04:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have to agree that my initial remark was not productive, however I didn't remove it myself both because it began a discussion, and because I am leery of removing my own words from a discussion, as the act reeks of deception. I believe than any civility issues I may have had began and ended with that remark, however it is difficult to engage someone as confrontational as that IP editor without the appearance of loosing one's cool. I have already re-phrased my opinion on the talk page, if you wish to involve yourself in the discussion. MjolnirPants   Tell me all about it.  04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Show
Right now, I'm watching WM. Spoiler free (maybe show is the new WWE World champ). If you want, ask for the ban yourself. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I saw the show and I cryed a lot. About the user, It's better to ask for a ban. Some users warned him months ago and he doesn't learn. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Warrior image
Hi LM2000, just sayin' your Commons upload was  starship.paint   "YES!" 05:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * mm. I'm in a bit of a mess now. Will probably do other stuff than Warrior's in the next few days. starship.paint   "YES!" 07:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Information pertaining to the "Death" section of recently deceased public figure/professional wrestler, Warrior aka Ultimate Warrior aka James Hellwig". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  operator /  talk  22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ric flairs gonna return dumbass!!
it has been reported that ric flair is gonna return to monday night june 16 hes gonna manag the miz so if you think im not gonna write again yo ass is wrong if you delete it again ima write again if you do delete it ill report you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwelover620 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Titles
Michael22 finaly appeared in the talk page. Some help? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you know we also have this --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review
Hi LM2000, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship .paint   ~ regal  15:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Veda Scott
FYI: The article Veda Scott, which was previously deleted per your vote to do so, has been recreated and is up for deletion again. Your input would be appreciated. Articles_for_deletion/Veda_Scott_(2nd_nomination) Tchaliburton (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, LM2000. I've been watching this AfD, and I need to respond to several questions that were raised.  I am not actively involved in editing pro wrestling articles, and wanted to talk with someone who is.  Do you edit wrestling articles?  If so, would you mind trading an email or two about questions I have?  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Team Dixie
I have absolutely no "Ownership" issues all I'm trying too do is use the proper wrestling terminology that was created too describe certain characters in professional wrestling JMichael22 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Broker
I added convenience store broker. Why was it removed?

Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Spammed Link?
I don't know what you mean? I just signed up today to add an edit?

Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

There is no external link under broker? Only see also
I see a bunch of other brokers, but I can't add convenience store broker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

WWE Reliable Source
i want to thank you for showing me what websites are okay and not okay to use, and trying to find a reliable source on what i posted is by websites are there not reliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talk • contribs) 01:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Yea i've been trying to fix stuff, like HHH Pedigree, deleted all of Stings Themes off his Wiki, and left one theme on there and that source was from a website i never heard of and the link was dead, so i had to take 4 hours out of my day and try to find sources, and i bet HHH Pedigree will remove what i did anyways — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talk • contribs) 01:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

(professional wrestling) -> (wrestling)
I saw you sorta proposed moving the articles as so, and so did. I support that as well. If anyone of you is willing to propose it after the current requested move fails, I compiled a list. Controversial ones like Referee (professional wrestling) are at the top and might not be wise to move those. starship .paint   ~ regal  07:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about Cruiserweight. Unlike boxing and MMA, wrestling weight classes have boring names like "66 kg" and "84 kg". The Authority is probably safe, too. Amateur wrestling's authority is called FILA. The (WCW) and (TNA) bits are probably enough for Team Canada. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:38, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Apparently, FILA's called United World Wrestling now. Sounds sort of fake. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:41, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds totally "professional", heh. I have already inserted a note at the top of the Authority pointing to UWW. starship  .paint   ~ regal  23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Great work as always starship. One that stands out for me is Shoot (professional wrestling), which should probably stay where it is so it is not confused with Shoot wrestling.LM2000 (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, "shooting" in wrestling wrestling means going for a takedown. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:44, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated the list. LM2000 do you agree with Hulk's explanation for Cruiserweight? starship  .paint   ~ regal  23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have much of an issue with it as the MMA Cruiserweight article was deleted for being not notable enough, so the professional wrestling article is the only Cruiserweight wrestling article extant, unless you count boxing for some reason.LM2000 (talk) 03:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Right. List finalized then? Only five pages won't be moved. starship  .paint   ~ regal  04:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Feedback's suggestion for Pinfall was a good one. Besides that I think we're just about finalized.LM2000 (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hulk brought up that pinfall only refers to a successful 1, 2, 3, instead of any unsuccessful pin. Therefore, pin should stay. I got Team Canada (WCW) moved. 1 down, 999 to go. starship  .paint   ~ regal  05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking at the Cruiserweight article, it seems we should do something about that title. Of all the championships listed, few are called that. "Light Heavyweight" seems the most common, or "Junior". But yeah, no rush. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:32, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * - I thought this division's greatest exposure was through WCW/WWF/WWE. List of WWE Cruiserweight Champions says "WCW/WWF/WWE Cruiserweight Championship" from 1996–2007. While other promotions have other names, I'm not sure their terms have had the same exposure. starship  .paint   ~ regal  05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Was", definitely. Today, not so much. The Internet has opened up a whole world beyond regularly scheduled programming. But aside from that, when people are reading that particular article, they'll be exposed to all the names. So that article's title should reflect the article's content.


 * On the other hand, despite the list, the Promotions section content obviously couldn't be less concerned about any of the twelve current divisions that aren't TNA, or the other ten defunct ones (that's even counting the NWA as one). So by that math, "Cruiserweight" has 66% and is fine, I suppose. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:31, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Bayley and the rest were closed at not moved, I'd say we have a green light to start a new move request. Tag. I started Talk:Blading (professional wrestling) for the first 20. starship .paint   ~ regal  13:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * So, judging by the responses to the new move request... would you, LM2000 and be willing to compromise to (pro wrestling) instead? In the hope of some progress rather than none.  starship  .paint   ~ regal  13:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the (wrestling) side makes a very good case, and see no reason not to hope for full progress. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:34, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Hulk, there's still a good chance the move will happen. If it doesn't we can talk about it then.LM2000 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read and comment delete or keep Dao's theorem
Hello LM2000,

See history of Euclidean geometry I think You have knowledgeable classical geometry, please read pages Dao's theorem and comment anything You think. Delete or keep pages Dao's theorem. Thank to You very much.

Best regards

Sincerely

--Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

What delete roman reigns,Nicknames and managers?what?i again edit roman reigns wikipedia.never again boy,never. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanreigns54 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Help
Hi. Can you help me? An user, Peroxwhyhalo, includes unsourced and unnecesary information in Matt Taven and Cedric Alexander. We warned him and explaned the situation, but he includes the information over and over (no notable events/matches). I reproted him for vandal, but the user told me he wasn't a vandal. What can I do? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, man. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I Hear You
So if I get sources from these sites can I keep my info on the page ?

Dont you think you should put what ppv the specific defense happened at instead of just listing people he beat?

Bruiser Brody's death
Just wondering were you there in the locker room Did YOU SEE THE KNIFE go into him. your comment is correct he was acquitted of those charges therefore he is innocent If was convicted then you can say he did it but unless you actually saw it and know he was proven guilty in a court of law then i believe they call that libel or maybe it is slander i forget which is which but that is not the point you just seem to get sexual gratification from editing my posts Obviously you have no life so i will cease editing all together since I am not good enough for your all mighty standards GOOD DAY SIR! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.18.75.138 (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)


 * "Almighty" is one word. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:46, December 7, 2014 (UTC)

WWE HQ Picture
LM, We do not need to put WWE HQ on WWE's page. No other wrestling promotion has their HQ so why put WWE's HQ? I am not being disrupted by the way. It is just ticking me off how people always undo my posts. Thanks for reading

thatwweguy_619 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatwweguy 619 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Apology
Hello LM

I apologize for being in this "edit war." However, I did tell everyone who kept rolling my edits back to check my post at Talk:WWE It seems like they are not listening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatwweguy 619 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

About The New Day (professional wrestling)
Hi LM2000!

I declined the speedy - it indicated some significance, at least by being about three WWE guys. Please feel free to take it to AfD - if the usual outcome for tag teams is that they get deleted, the article still should go through the process.

(I wonder if the young chap who wrote the article knows it's all kayfabe yet?) --Shirt58 (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your explanation. I assumed it would be a toss-up as to whether it would actually get deleted but since it would have saved time I thought it was worth a try.  Since I tagged the article, I'll give the chap some time to see if he can improve the article, however unlikely that may be.LM2000 (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)