User talk:LMAOUKBoi



Hello, LMAOUKBoi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 09:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
An article you recently created, Draft:Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz 💬 21:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to In the End even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the [ page history] for now. Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Galaxy Buds 2 Pro
Hello, LMAOUKBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Galaxy Buds 2 Pro


Hello, LMAOUKBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Galaxy Buds 2 Pro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at In the End (Black Veil Brides song), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry LMAOUKBoi (talk) 22:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

theodysseyonline.com does not meet WP:RS guidelines
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I didn't know that LMAOUKBoi (talk) 00:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:RSMUSIC has a list of sources that are generally considered usable on Wikipedia. It can be a helpful guide until you learn how to recognize reliable sources on your own. Similarly, there's WP:NOTRSMUSIC that lists websites you should stay away from using on Wikipedia. Sergecross73   msg me  00:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)