User talk:LMPAJ

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hector Carlos Lora (December 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hector Carlos Lora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hector Carlos Lora, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hector_Carlos_Lora Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hector_Carlos_Lora reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello LMPAJ. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LMPAJ. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * LMPAJ has clearly denied PAID and COI on User page, and that should be taken at face value unless there is evidence to the contrary. David notMD (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Writing about topics close to your heart
I saw your user page.

One of the reasons that the WP:Conflict of interest guideline exists is that it's harder to write objectively about things you care about than things that are not "near and dear to your heart."

It might help to think about each edit you make to topics related to Passaic from the point of view of someone who assumes you are writing "for the purposes of promotion" before you publish the edit. Hopefully, this will result in all of your edits being appropriate, neutral, not giving undue weight to something, and otherwise being more encyclopedic than they would be if you don't "play devil's advocate" with your edits. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  16:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your advice, I am really glad about it and will take it into consideration. I am most definitely keeping my thoughts objective after feedback from reviewers :). LMPAJ (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hector Carlos Lora (December 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hector Carlos Lora and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hector Carlos Lora, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hector_Carlos_Lora Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hector_Carlos_Lora reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

January 2021
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Huracán Alex (2016) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Please post this at es.wikipedia.org with the attribution.  Spiderone  16:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention! I did not notice I had done this. I'll post it in the Spanish Wikipedia.

Your draft article, Draft:Hector Carlos Lora


Hello, LMPAJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hector Carlos Lora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hector Carlos Lora has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hector Carlos Lora. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)