User talk:LSDworld

Speedy deletion nomination of Viewout Vocab Trainer
Hello LSDworld,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Viewout Vocab Trainer for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,  Dewritech (talk)  10:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Viewout Vocab Trainer


The article Viewout Vocab Trainer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Viewout Vocab Trainer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viewout Vocab Trainer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viewout Vocab Trainer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Dewritech (talk)  10:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)