User talk:LSandin

Deletion of our page
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article, following its tagging by another admin, because
 * it did not provide aedequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you actually gave decent references for the text you posted, there was no factual data to show notability as defined. There is little about the company itself other than locations. How many employees? Turnover? Profits?
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Your text, apart from a bit of history, was all about your products with, as noted above, nothing about the company
 * You have a separate awards section with the usual list (both always a bad sign), but no criticisms of the company or indication of any limitations to your products
 * Key parts of the "legal influence seem to be sourced to yourself, although the link appears to be dead
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case for spamlinks to a product page.


 * I do not see how our page should be deleted and the other ones not.&mdash;You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

I've seen worse, and I'm prepared to recreate in a user page for you to improve it, but that may have to wait until tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll restore here shortly. Note that COI editing about companies and products is strongly discouraged, because of the difficulty in getting an objective article from such an editor, and you need to get it right if it is to survive reposting Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)