User talk:LSislen/sandbox

First let me apologize profusely for inadvertently making your life harder. I mistakenly posted your feedback to the article talk page rather than the user talk page as I should have. I'm posting it here now and am gonna send you an email to notify you.

Jb8527a (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) In the initial overview of the topic of recontextualization, it would appear to me that the one sentence definition of the term could be simplified into more layman's terms. That being said, I'm not familiar with the topic, so that could be more difficult than I am perceiving. Either way, just wanted to bring attention to it!
 * 2) "recontextualisation implies a change of meaning and redefinition" change of meaning and redefinition appear to mean the same thing in this context, I think you could take one of these out here and have it flow better.
 * 3) It might help your readers if you give a simple definition as to what "the social economy of texts" is.
 * 4) As I continue to make comments going down, I think the biggest comment overall is the fact that I think the language could be simplified more, as the article right now uses a good deal of vocabulary particular to the field that might be outside the understanding of the average reader.
 * 5) In the Section of Per Linell's different levels of recontextualization, I think examples similar to the one at the end of the interdiscursive definition would be useful in the previous two definitions as well.
 * 6) I like and appreciate the comprehensive nature of the citations in this article!
 * 7) For the final section on precontextualization, is there any more information available on this topic? This seems more like a footnote or an aside that an additional section.