User talk:LUNDAVRA

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kingturtle 03:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

A vs an
No, "an RAF" should be used rather than "a RAF". An is used rather than a before a word starting with a vowel or vowel sound. As "RAF" is pronounced "R", "A", "F", and not as "raff", and thus starts with a vowel sound, an is the correct form.

See A, an and compare google searches on "a RAF" vs. "an RAF".

Sc147 15:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Cable landing point
I've replied on my talk page. WLD 12:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for all of the names of people who were diagnosed with breast cancer. I've added some of them and am still working on the many others.

Since you have been very kind to provide this information, I wonder if you could add a comment about the fact that certain people want to merge the List of notable breast cancer patients according to occupation and the List of notable breast cancer patients according to survival status. The occupation list is much more comprehensive, but that's the one that they want to delete. The survival status is more basic, but it serves a vital purpose in allowing anyone interested to quickly ignore those who have died and concentrate on the living - either for charity purposes or just for inspiration without depression as might happen if a person was viewing a list that was interspersed with the dead as well as the living.

It seems as though some people are voting to merge the lists without even indicating why and without even bothering to appear to read the reasons given for one or the other choice and responding to those reasons. I'm not that expert, but it seems as though it would be a total waste of time to just delete all of that vital information just because people, who probably have not been affected by breast cancer, don't realize the value of both lists.

I'm tired of arguing with some of these people over what appear to be petty issues when I could be actually working to make wikipedia more comprehensive. It makes me wonder if some of these people are just full-time critics rather than contributors.

Thanks again for all of your leads!Bcsurvivor 22:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. I put a long list from the DNB on your page then realised it was on the User Page rather than Discussion Page so deleted it though you can still get it from history.  If you want more details on any of the names on the list then contact me and I can look up in the DNB.  --jmb 23:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much. I just read what you wrote re: the merge, and I really appreciate it.  Also, I did find that long list of all of those names, and I was amazed.  I have added a few, and I'm going to work on more tomorrow.  I really appreciate it because it can be hard to find out who was diagnosed with breast cancer.  Thanks again! Bcsurvivor 03:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Dangerous Energy - List of ROF's
Hi Jmb, thanks for your comments.

I have Dangerous Energy - a great book, it was some 12 months late comming out due to the run down of the Royal Commission on Historic Monuments in England and its absorption into English Heritage. I bought it full price in 2000, its now greatly reduced (less than 25% of list price). I also have Nevell, Roberts & Smith, and I'm listed in the Subscribers (but not as Pyrotec!).

I have to agree that ROF Capenhurst, etc, which are in Cocroft's list, are missing from the Wikipeda List of ROFs - Capenhurst became a nuclear site. I've tended to use the Official Histories of the Second War War, Civil Series, some of which I listed in some of the individual ROF pages; and they are not complete. It would have been easier to use Cocroft, I just got into the habit of doing it the way I'd always done it. I also discovered a remaindered book on 20th century Industrial Archaeology, by Stratton and Trinder, which includes some ROFs.

I started working on railways in Scotland, just for a change, but I'm coming back onto doing some more ROFs. Pyrotec 21:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * OK. I saw it later listed as a reference for one of the ROF pages.  All the English Heritage books tend to be late out - there is one on WWII radar that has been promised for the last few years but still no sign of it appearing. I only came across the Civil Series when someone found one secondhandin a gift shop for a few quid!  I am watching out for any others now as I would like to get some of them.  I started mysewlf listing radar stations on a Wiki page, I think I have all the Chain Home stations and when I get time will add a list of Chain Home Low, perhaps later add pages with photographs for the ones i have visited.  --jmb 22:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I have Works & Buildings; Labour in the Munitions Industries; Factories & Plant; Contracts & Finance; and, Administration of War Production - but for 45 to 55-ish year old books, they are quite expensive from 2nd hand internet bookshops, and still a few more to get. Southampton Univ still has a complete set on its shelves! Pyrotec 22:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I take it that you have seen that there are some site visits to ROF sites on the Sub Brit website? --jmb 10:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the web link. I was a member of Sub Brit from about 1979 to 1985, but dropped out. I came across their ROF Sywnnerton visit a year or so ago, but lost their web link; I see they have also have Trecwn.


 * I was at ROF Chorley this Wednesday so I took a small number of photos, for possible uploading. Pyrotec 22:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Halliwell
Hello,

I was editing other things in the Halliwell Article, and didn't take notice of the Date of Death. I Googled him and the sources that give the 29th are mostly taking their info from Wiki. But the DNB date seems far more reliable. Please have the honor of changing it in the Article.

Regards,


 * Michael David 15:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

OK done, I put the full name of the hospice there as well. I don't know if you are aware but you can get online access to the DNB and other reference sources through many public libraries. Several give online membership even if you do not live in the area, including Bedfordshire and Manchester.


 * Thank you for the reference source tip - I am going to look into it here.


 * By the way, I, too, remember typewriters - I did all of my college work on one. Also, I'll do you one better on the rotary telephones; I remember when you would pick up the receiver and a voice would ask you "number please".


 * I also dream of visiting Scotland one day.


 * Be healthy,


 * Michael David 17:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I just found the thingies with the typewriter and rotary phone somewhere in Wiki. I only just gave up my rotary phone a month ago when I retired.  Two weeks out of three I was on call 24/7 and found the bell on the old 760 rotary phone would wake me better than the bleeps of modern phones so kept it (the company paid the rental).  If you join Bedfordshire Library you get your ID/password immediately, Manchester post the card.  It might be worth checking your own local library as most just use their library card number.  There are some very good sources available online through them.  --jmb 20:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Jmb,


 * Is the E-mail address on your User Page still active; and, if it is, would you mind if I communicated with you that way - just to chat?
 * Michael David 21:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * If you follow the link to My Site you will find an EMail address. --jmb 23:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:PICT6266a XLR-LNR Plug.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PICT6266a XLR-LNR Plug.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Burghead mast
Please see note at Talk:Burghead transmitting station re {reqphotoin|Scotland}. I was passing and am not sure if the image is appropriate. Ben MacDui 08:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

OK - thanks. I 've put the image on the article page. Ben MacDui 17:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

It's come up again...
You might want to have a quick look at the Gee talk page. I'm seriously considering moving it to "Gee" unless someone has a good reason not to. Dippy's own article on the topic called it "Gee", so that's my good reason. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

RAF Signals 1939-1945
With this edit you introduced a non existent template into the Gee (navigation) article. it is called Template:RAF Signals 1939-1945 was that your intention of are you trying to cite a book with something like the harvnb, cite book pair? -- PBS (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Not sure how I put the "{" there, removed now.
 * There is more information on the Continental GEE chains but it is bit ambiguous and difficult to sort out so I lost interest in it. jmb (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. "RAF Signals 1939-1945" is it a book or an archive? Has it been published? Have you given enough information so that if someone wants to verify the source they can? -- PBS (talk) 01:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * It was one of the official histories produced at the end of WWII and should be available at some archives. I don't think a printed copy was generally released.  I would think it is the primary source used in most of the books and references about radar history in WWII.  jmb (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I had a look at Google books but could not find "RAF Signals 1939-1945" but what I did find was The Second World War, 1939-1945, Royal Air Force, Signals would that be the tome? If so which volume and do you have page numbers? -- PBS (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Paloma Faith#Age". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 00:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Vote on Billie Piper Talk Page
Hello! I opened a vote on the Billie Piper talk page. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Billie_Piper#VOTE:_.22Billie_Paul_Piper_.28born_Leian_Paul_Piper.29.22_instead_of_.22Lianne.22 Israell (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jmb. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jmb~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)