User talk:L mac19

I appreciate the effort you've put into the Oxted hockey club page (although it might be an idea to move it to Oxted Hockey Club, names are case sensitive, once you been registered a few days, you will be able to do this easily with the "move page" button), but I don't think it's really necessary to insert a link to it from the main Field hockey article (making it the only club referred to there). I've tightened up the categorisation of the article, so anyone looking for hockey articles should find it anyway. There might be more of a case for including it under the England Hockey article. However, there are some people who may well think that the club is not sufficiently notable to merit an article at all, so don't be surprised if it is tagged for deletion. It might help if you can explain (or link to articles which explain) what makes the club notable, there is no article on Calum Giles for example, nor one that explains the league structure of hockey in England, so it is not clear to the average reder what being in Div 2 South of the English Hockey League means in terms of the club's standing. 12:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Oxted hockey club for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oxted hockey club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oxted hockey club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:NBLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:NBLogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:NatterboxLogo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NatterboxLogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NatterboxLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:NatterboxLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)