User talk:La7312

November 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to William Henry Harrison have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 01:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Tyler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 01:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Tyler, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Henry Harrison. CLCStudent (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi, La7312. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pauline Robinson Bush. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 02:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Sebring. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 02:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think we've had enough. -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 02:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)